Talk:Systems medicine

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Systems theory. Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just asking .. isn't "Systems medicine" just a funky name for good old physiology? And if that's true, shouldn't physiology at least be mentioned?

Wolf 87.187.180.52 (talk) 07:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How true you have pointed out the catch. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this is a curious mix of Chopra's woo and some perfectly sensible research groups. Pinkbeast (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]