Talk:Star Wars: Skeleton Crew

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Star Wars High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Star Wars To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles. Citing sources : Jedi, Sith Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction. Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..." Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs Other : * See the things to do page Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Disney Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force. California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force. This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Every Star Wars live-action series, which have the prefix "Star Wars" before its actual title, have their articles at simply the actual series name,with perhaps (TV series) dab if it's called after a character or a page already exists with no dab. To keep consistency, shouldn't this page be at Draft:Skeleton Crew (TV series)? — SirDot (talk) 03:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Draft talk:Skeleton Crew (TV series)

 – Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have it at Star Wars: Skeleton Crew? We’ve been discussing it at the Project Star Wars talk page and to have all the Disney+ live action series drop Star Wars from their page titles while the animated series still have theirs gives off bad implications I’d rather not remain--CreecregofLife (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The title should match what the series is actually called, the animated series still using "Star Wars" in the title is a decision that has been made by the producers not us. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And Star Wars is in all the logos. Don’t put this off on the producers when it’s so clearly a Wikipedia decision CreecregofLife (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Being in the logo does not make it part of the actual title. Anything can be put on a logo or poster, what counts is what the official title is that the producers use in official filings and press releases, etc. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked and it does look like Lucasfilm is officially using Star Wars: Skeleton Crew as the full title for this series, so we should probably move the draft there. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s already moved. I’m not sure why this talkpage didn’t move with it CreecregofLife (talk) 02:53, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I just saw that, looks like something got mucked up. I'm not sure if we need to try clean this up or not. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CreecregofLife: @Adamstom.97: I moved your discussion here and redirected the old draft talk. Attribution noted at the top. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! CreecregofLife (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is reliable, they did have a previous correct scoop with the Ezra casting but they treated their own report as unconfirmed until the trades picked it up so I think we should probably wait for the same on this one. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also felt it was unreliable. I tagged it than outright removing it. I thought D23 would have confirmed these kids but that didn't happen, so I'd support removing it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have hidden them for now. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]