This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Impressed. Lots of useful stuff here. I'd like to nominate as GA (Good article status), but it would fail without more in-line & reputable references. To be honest, It's borderline whether it should be a 'B', but benefit-of-the-doubt, good-faith etc. I've not seen anything wrong, just unreferenced. Have to respect hard work.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 07:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lakeside archaeology
This document might be useful for something.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Impressed. Lots of useful stuff here. I'd like to nominate 
as GA (Good article status), but it would fail without more in-line & reputable references. To be honest, It's borderline whether it should be a 'B', but benefit-of-the-doubt, good-faith etc. I've not seen anything wrong, just unreferenced. Have to respect hard work.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 07:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)