Talk:Sarah Bagley

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 19, 2017 and April 19, 2021.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organized Labour Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for April 19th. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Women's History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Given the dramatic change in the importance level made recently, I've begun a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Organized_Labour#Importance_of_Sarah_Bagley. Let's try to reach a consensus there before we change it again. Thanks. – Scartol · Talk 15:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And get rid of a "lede" consisting of one long copyright-violating quote from somebody else! --Orange Mike 15:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. While the quote is excellent in that it summarizes neatly what a lead should include, it's not kosher to have just a quote for the lead. Let's paraphrase the ideas instead. – Scartol · Talk 16:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, the conflict in reported date of death needs to be fixed. I would consider the authoritative source to be the Martha Mayo website at U. of Mass. - Lowell(http://library.uml.edu/clh/Bag.htm), which states that the exact date of death is unknown at present.Tjepsen (talk) 15:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sarah Bagley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 14:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

John Allen became the new editor of The Voice of Industry and immediately fired Bagley. She wrote that Allen “does not want a female department. It would conflict with the opinions of the mushroom aristocracy that he seeks to favorite, and beside it would not be dignified.” [citation needed]

• Removed as unable to find reliable source. MurielMary (talk) 09:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I traced the "mushroom aristocracy" quotation to multiple reliable sources and restored it, adding a citation to the most reliable one among those I found. Clio.at.work (talk) 20:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Sarah Bagley.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some sources give her DOB as the 29, others as the 19 Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ie 29 and 19 Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]