Talk:Railway stations in the Netherlands

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles Trains: Stations / By country series Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by the By country series task force. This article lacks references.

See also: Template:Infobox station (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs).

Please expand on the usage of "=" in Driebergen=Zeist etc. I understand that it can be useful in a list of stations separated by "-", but this usage seems to be rare in schedules etc. - Patrick 20:08, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I changed it back to "-"; it seems either outdated or just applied in particular cases. - Patrick 23:26, 24 Dec 2003 (UTC)

There are a lot of deprecated links on this page. for instance in the line "Demos of two types of ticket machines: [24] (does not show fares), [25] (with fares, but not quite up-to-date).", both of the references are dead. There are numerous others.;Bear 16:03, 2004 Jul 9 (UTC)

I fixed a number of instances of bad English, there's quite a few more that I don't dare touch. Bz2 21:10, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If it's "bad English" that's in question, then I deprecate the above usage of "deprecated" (sorry, Bear!) -- Picapica 23:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth seperating the list from the rest of the content? Railwayfan2005 (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think the rest would survive as a standalone article.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]