This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
Dixie Highway proposal sources
Lawrence, Eric (October 6, 2016). "Historic Path Can't Get State Honor: Law Blocks Designation of 200-Year-Old Route as Pure Michigan Byway". Detroit Free Press. pp. 1A, 13A. Retrieved July 13, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.
Michigan Department of Transportation (n.d.). Pure Michigan Byways (PDF) (Map). Scale not given. Lansing: Michigan Department of Transportation. Retrieved July 13, 2018.
Other information
Graphic Design Unit (January 2018). Pure Michigan Byways and Tour Routes Driving Guide (PDF). Lansing: Michigan Department of Transportation. Retrieved July 13, 2018.
Why, and how can this be featured?
Why does the main table of this article have two columns for length? The second one is such a waste of space. And to me, kind of mind-numbing about what the rest of this article has to say. Has this been discussed and actually defended? --Doncram (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Doncram: there a few reasons why there are two columns. It's a standard feature of {{convert}} using |disp=table. Other FLs on highways like List of Interstate Highways in Michigan (promoted in 2014) use the separate columns. It's also been fairly standard on highway articles to use the separate columns; look at any of the thousands of highway articles' junction/exit lists, look at Interstate 75 in Michigan#Exit list (an FA), for example. Imzadi 1979→ 22:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]