Talk:PostMormon Community

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Redirect, 3 December 2021, see discussion. keep, 6 August 2008, see discussion.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2021 and 23 October 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HopeGirl2012.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I wonder about the appropriateness of having so many links to the various billboards - remember, this is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement for this organization. The article already walks the thin line between information and advertisement... maybe these should be removed. A link to one of them, in-line in the article, is probably sufficient. Tan | 39 16:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. This is my first article. The billboards are what the group is best known for externally, and what has generated most press coverage it has received, so I though it might be appropriate. I'll take them down. Cheers! Rich mccue (talk) 22:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rich, I hope you don't mind that I've gone ahead and made a few grammatical and spelling corrections, which you can see. Are you going to mention the hosting of Peepstone and Postmormon magazines or is that advertisement? I'm wondering if it might not be a good idea - and a fair description - to mention that Postmo often functions beyond its remit viz. Mormon concerns, as a very lively and even zany social forum often addressing personal, religious, social and philosophical questions on a more general level. And as Tan says, this is an encyclopedia article, so I think it would be wise to include what many wiki articles of this sort include, which is 'criticisms'. This may forestall any idea that it's simply an advertisement, and may dissuade anyone from putting together a 'Criticisms of Postmo' section themselves. It would show a certain forthrightness in the article from the very start, which itself would be in postmo spirit. Bamboom Bamboom2 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help with grammer & spelling. You're right a criticisms section would be good. I'll work on that next. Rich mccue (talk) 06:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on PostMormon Community. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021204257/http://www.usustatesman.com/2.5354/post-mormon-community-on-campus-1.557576 to http://www.usustatesman.com/2.5354/post-mormon-community-on-campus-1.557576

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]