Talk:Passing off

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Passing off (legal term) → Passing off — Put article back where it came from. Article was moved because someone thought that it needed to make way for a disambig page. It later turned out that the other terms were not 'Passing off' but 'Passing', so if the current disambig page was cleaned strictly according to MoS:DP, it would meet WP:SPEEDY. AliceJMarkham 07:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

• Support reason given in request says it all. --AliceJMarkham 07:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. Clackmannanshireman 01:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Abstain: This is one of those many occasions where the move should just be done. No need for a vote. Paul Beardsell 03:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments: I agree with Paul, but was uncertain whether there might be any controversy. I would otherwise have put it into 'uncontroversial moves'. I believe that we can declare consensus. --AliceJMarkham 05:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.