Talk:Partial-order planning

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Large diff, not sure if some should be reverted

This article was basically rewritten here. They have expanded the article but the quality appears to have decreased. Many links are broken and categories are removed. I'm not an expert in the area but some changes seem dubious (chiefly, changing the introduction from an automated planning focus to a brain/cognition focus). It might be useful to merge/revert in some of the earlier content. -Phoglenix (talk) 05:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now merged in the changes from before that large diff -Phoglenix (talk) 07:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is quite outdated in its discussion of the merits of partial order planning vs. total order planning. The latter is considered far superior these days, most notably because the difficulty of generating good heuristics for partial order planning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.142.72.167 (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]