Talk:One Lujiazui

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Skyscrapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Created page. It seems the most commonly cited hight is 269 meters (at least on the 2-3 sources I looked at), is that hight the same thing as the "top floor" hight on the skyscraper info box? Flffy'd (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recently uploaded these two photos of One Lujiazui that I took while travelling through China last month, but I'm not sure which one is more appropriate for inclusion. I'm going to put the cropped photo on the article's page, but someone more invested in this page can switch it if they think that other one is better.Ferox Seneca (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]