Talk:Ojos Así

Ojos Así has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 13, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Shakira High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakira, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shakira on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakiraWikipedia:WikiProject ShakiraTemplate:WikiProject ShakiraShakira articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles Regional and national music Mid‑importance Ojos Así is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Latin music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Colombia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Courtesy rtytrewerty accurate enough feel free to fix it, however I think it sufficient; human translations actually make sense as opposed to translators! 65.229.51.247 23:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I daniel(daniel625) added the correct title for the song as it was recorded in english, but left the translation as it would have been without the re-recording.

Image:Ojosasi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:10343shakiraojosasi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that a Greek artist recently adapted "Ojos Asi".

The song is "Katazeititai" from Natassa Theodoridou (Νατάσα Θεοδωρίδου).

I know not how to edit the article properly and ask that anyone who does, do so if they wouldn't mind.

Thanks!

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ojos Así. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718225838/http://stiri.kappa.ro/magazin/07-07-2006/shakira-vine-la-timisoara-cu-prietenul-ei-99178.html to http://stiri.kappa.ro/magazin/07-07-2006/shakira-vine-la-timisoara-cu-prietenul-ei-99178.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ojos Así/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 20:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

• Hi, I'll review this soonish, a couple of initial points below. FunkMonk (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Gloria Estefan is WP:duplinked two times.

•  Done – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't think the single source used is strong or specific enough to label the song "Arabic pop". It is a Latin pop song with elements of general Arabic music, but that's not exactly the same as being part of that particular genre. I'd suggest looking for better sources for that statement, or state specifically that one writer has called it "Arabic pop".

• I replaced it with a source from American Songwriter magazine. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It appears Magiciandude wrote most of this article, have they been contacted about this nomination? FunkMonk (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here, I'm just waiting for the full. review. Erick (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I usually start with a little sample of issues to see if nominators are even active. And I only realise now that you and Eric are the same... FunkMonk (talk) 18:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to work on this either Sunday or Monday as those are my only days off work. Erick (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Shakira should be linked and presented again at first mention outside the intro.

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "producer in the Hispanic market" Link to something. Either just Hispanic or if there is something for the Hispanic market.

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "Equipment for the recording of Dónde Están los Ladrones? included" Present and link the album. Like "Equipment for the recording of her subsequent album Dónde Están los Ladrones?" or similar

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "Dónde Están los Ladrones? took nine months to produce" I don't think you need to repeat the entire name of the album when it has just been mentioned in the former sentence, just say "the album".

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "The track is sung half in Spanish, half in Arabic" Half? As far as I recall, there is one verse in Arabic and some backing, so half is a bit much, no?

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "prompted American singer Gloria Estefan, Emilio Estefan's wife" This is the second time she's presented in the same section.

• Erick has fixed this. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Link belly dancing.

•  Done – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• If you want to underline the Arabic angle, it's conspicuous that the section about live performances doesn't mention that she belly dances during the song.

• I added a sentence about a particular performance to help with that issue. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• No list of musicians for the recording?

•  Done – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd assume Arabic musicians would have been hired for the instrumentation, a process that could be interesting to describe if possible. In the MTV unplugged version, there are at least Arabic musicians and singers.

• I don't have that CD of hers, but I do have her other CDs with that song on them and pulled names from there. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• It seems like an oversight that an article about her probably only Arabic influenced song doesn't mention it's because she's half Lebanese and how this would have influenced it.

• I found a source that provides this context. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Was the English version released as a single?

• It doesn't seem like it was. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "Shakira performing the song on The Sun Comes Out World Tour (2010–11)." How do we know it's this song specifically?

• I looked at the archive version and the article does say she performed the song during a performance of that tour. – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• That should be it for now, Magiciandude. FunkMonk (talk) 22:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting an extra week to work on this. Erick (talk) 01:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. FunkMonk (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Erick is busy IRL. If it is okay with the reviewer, I wouldn't mind jumping in to help Erick with this nomination. Best – jona ✉ 14:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with me. FunkMonk (talk) 14:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have fixed the issues that Erick had yet to complete. Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be done. Best – jona ✉ 17:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, the new source added about Arabic pop is better, but it confirms what I suspected earlier, and that the song can at most be said to have elements of Arabic pop, it is not itself an Arabic pop song. Here's what the source says: "as the song incorporates elements of Arabic pop and also includes Arabic song lyrics". So I think this still needs to be specified with more cautious language. FunkMonk (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reworded the sentence. Best – jona ✉ 23:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice, the intro needs a similar adjustment. FunkMonk (talk) 08:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – jona ✉ 12:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good, so I'll promote this now. FunkMonk (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and allowing me to step in for Erick. Best – jona ✉ 16:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]