Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction

North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 3, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance). Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Would it not make sense to merge this article with the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction?

User:G._Moore talk 20:59, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NC Insight 1990 -Indy beetle (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

-Indy beetle (talk) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: NSNW (talk · contribs) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will start the review in a few days; will also do the three other reviews concerning the North Carolina government. NSNW (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Prose:

Very little issues here:

History of the office

• "In 1868 the state ratified a new constitution which provided for a system of public schools to be led by a Superintendent of Public Instruction and a State Board of Education"; pronoun misusage, 'which provided' should be 'that provided'.
• "but the bill was quashed in a House of Representatives' committee."; the noun form is incorrect, remove the apostrophe.

Duties and structure

• "They are seventh in line of succession to the governor."; should be 'in the line of succession'.

That's everything. NSNW (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @NSNW: All should be good now per my edit. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Passing. NSNW (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]