Talk:May 1605 papal conclave

	May 1605 papal conclave has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 14, 2017 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 23, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the May 1605 papal conclave was the only known papal election to result in broken bones?
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 16, 2023.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Roman Curia (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roman Curia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Roman CuriaWikipedia:WikiProject Roman CuriaTemplate:WikiProject Roman CuriaRoman Curia articles European Microstates: Vatican City This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as High-importance). Catholicism Mid‑importance May 1605 papal conclave is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal conclave, May 1605/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jzsj (talk · contribs) 14:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article was carefully done. After a bit of copy editing for clarification, I judged the article to pass the criteria for a good article. Jzsj (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Nice little article. *NOTFORUM* alert, but the Spanish were presumably vetoing everyone who could possibly be a puppet of the HRE? Thanks for this all, good work. — O Fortuna ^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 16:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • France, actually. Philip III of Spain was a Habsburg and in the conclave a month earlier his representative had failed to veto Leo XI, a relative of the French queen, in a timely fashion. As an aside, should you want to see another Habsburg-Bourbon feud of a conclave that involved the HRE and not Spain, you could see Papal conclave, 1724. I don't have access to Pastor or Baumgartner at this moment, but I can go back through tonight or tomorrow and see if there are any other notable vetoes. I'm confident there were others on the exclusion list, but they were likely of cardinals who were never real contenders, which is why I might not have included them. I'll do another run through to see if there is anyone else who might benefit from a red link here. Also, thanks to you and Jzsj. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]