Talk:List of cities by sunshine duration

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Weather: General Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Article is missing all of southern hemisphere. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:09, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article keeps appearing in Category:Pages with script errors because the templates try to do too much work, and the allowed Lua time expires (the limit is 10 seconds). I have done a couple of massive edits to use a function in Module:Biglist as an experiment. One benefit of the new function is that the wikitext is simpler because the temperature value does not need to be duplicated.

The edit replaced lines like the first of the following with the second:

| style="{{Weather box/cols|183.0 }};"|183.0
| {{#invoke:biglist|weatherboxcols|183.0}}

The weatherboxcols function accepts one or two parameters. The first parameter determines the color. The value displayed is the second parameter (if not empty), or is the first parameter.

Searching the html source of the article for "NewPP" shows these results:

It would be possible to enhance the syntax of the wikitext so, for example, the Jan–Dec–Year values in each row are entered in a single row with spaces between each item. If that happened, there could be a template with a decent name rather than the #invoke shown above. That can happen later, if wanted.

@JohnBlackburne: I think you were trying to fix the script errors so I am pinging FYI. Johnuniq (talk) 10:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. It kept appearing in the category, often as the only article doing so. Purging the page would temporarily fix it but a permanent fix is much better. Making the wikitext cleaner and simpler would be good too, but fixing the performance is far more important, not only to stop the errors but to make it easier to edit.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of cities by sunshine duration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6E9CzPWoA?url=http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/documents/gruanmanuals/CIMO/CIMO_Guide-7th_Edition-2008.pdf to http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/documents/gruanmanuals/CIMO/CIMO_Guide-7th_Edition-2008.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116071752/http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/tr01-17.pdf to http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/tr01-17.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055035/http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3 to http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055035/http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3 to http://old-cdc.cma.gov.cn/shuju/search1.jsp?dsid=SURF_CLI_CHN_MUL_MMON_19712000_CES&tpcat=SURF&type=table&pageid=3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150806124550/http://www.maltaweather.com/information/maltas-climate/ to http://www.maltaweather.com/information/maltas-climate/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121118081428/http://www.aemet.es/en/conocermas/publicaciones/detalles/guia_resumida_2010 to http://www.aemet.es/en/conocermas/publicaciones/detalles/guia_resumida_2010
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116071752/http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/tr01-17.pdf to http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/tr01-17.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cities by sunshine duration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116054428/http://smn.cna.gob.mx/observatorios/historica/tacubaya.pdf to http://smn.cna.gob.mx/observatorios/historica/tacubaya.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of cities by sunshine duration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304041500/http://jrcc.sa/reports_files/1985_2010Reports/Riyadh-Air-Base.RTF to http://jrcc.sa/reports_files/1985_2010Reports/Riyadh-Air-Base.RTF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Different countries use different devices to measure sunshine duration

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1125-z Thus one could not compare one sunshine count to another. Meirfishman (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section looks like bulIshit. It simply cannot be that Sarajevo which is located in Southeastern Europe gets less sun than Minsk. And it also cannot be that Tallinn, a smug northern city way to the north from Minsk gets more sunshine than Minsk. Look up Tallinn photos, they are not fancy and sunny at all.

Stockholm also cannot be just barely below Minsk in sunshine hours, because that's a cold northern city where sun is rarity.

It looks to me that the reason for this atrocity of a section is link amalgamation. Different (and variously biased) sources were used to compile the table, and that's wrong because quantitative tabular data is only useful within a context of single research effort. If you compile numerical data from different sources you'll get chimaera like this table.

I have no obvious solution to this. Maybe this table shouldnt be in Wikipedia at all after all because its compilational nature borders on OR. I just want to warn people who look at this table for pragmatic reasons: take it with a huge grain of salt and dont trust it. Visit the cities and countries you look to live in and judge with your own eyes instead. 178.121.39.90 (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect there are large issues in general with measurement differences across countries, an example that stood out to me was Taipei, Taiwan has less sunshine than London, United Kingdom. I found a source for the data from Taiwan so the issue isn't improper sourcing which leads me to think it is measurement differences. 129.105.62.170 (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undoubtedly in such a large list there might be errors; but all of the issues presented here are perfectly normal and expected; reporting differences can cause differences, but generally not to this extent.

Northern does not equal more cloudy (in many cases cloudiness peaks at the middle of the mid-latitudes), and fog is an important factor limiting sunshine as well as 'regular cloudiness'.

Sarajevo is an inland city with a lot of winter fog; Talinn is rain-(cloud?)shadowed slightly by the mountain ranges in Norway, Minsk is not and is on the European Plain.

Taipei is a foggy city, so its sunshine is limited much like a city like Lima (though the two cities are in very different contexts; they are united by frequent fog). Compare Taichung, which is not foggy. Uness232 (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is known that sunlight help with better mood and health (not only Vit.D) and foster people going out and engaging with other people (friends or strangers) at parks, publics pools, beaches, street strolls, sports, etc. It should be mentioned and expanded upon

Solarriors (talk) 23:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC+2)

The template message says it’s better to create sub-articles because this one may be too long.

We have one for Europe right now. I was thinking wether it is a good idea to have articles for Asia and/or Africa as well.PAper GOL (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]