Talk:Les Bourgeois Winery

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Columbia, Missouri Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Columbia, an attempt to write quality articles about the Missouri city of Columbia and the surrounding Metropolitan Area. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Columbia, MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject Columbia, MissouriTemplate:WikiProject Columbia, MissouriColumbia, Missouri articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Missouri Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wine (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles

Hi Grey: No articles link here. I only wondered in because I was following a what links here search on a county article and found the mo template. Both the mo and columbia templates had to go since they don't mention the winery. Americasroof 15:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, is that the policy on templates!? If so I need to remove templates from several articles. Grey Wanderer | Talk 19:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got dinged on it a while back for doing the same thing. I don't know where the exact policy is but it would make sense. For instance it wouldn't make sense for the missouri template to be applied to every article on the state. I know it's more tempting to apply it on a smaller basis (e.g., Columbia) but that's where categories become useful. Anyway the article on the winery could easily be linked from the Columbia or Missouri wines articles. I see your edits on a lot of Missouri edits. Keep up the great work! Americasroof 21:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, both Mount Pleasant's and Les Bourgeois' Wiki pages say that they are the third largest wineries in Missouri. Obviously, both can't be true.Trinite (talk) 15:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question - I updated the link here (original reference link is dead). I'm doing some searching to see if I can find the information. Ravensfire (talk) 16:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Les Bourgeois Winery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fwbusinesspress.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=7281&SectionID=45&SubSectionID=99&S=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619143114/http://www.missouriwine.com/AboutUs.asp to http://www.missouriwine.com/AboutUs.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]