Talk:Joy (perfume)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France: Paris Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Paris task force.

If this is one of the "best known perfumes in the world," why does it have such a tiny article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.74.231 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT. --Shirt58 (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

whats there to say? youd have to smell it. maybe we can develop a scratch n sniff digital format for wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.80.6.163 (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image of this perfume is not the original bottle. I'v found a correct image but I don't know how to upload the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.119.193.133 (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that fragrance designers claim to include certain flowers but they make it so vague as to what variety or species it is. Michelia is a former genus but includes very different smelling flowers. Michelia champaca is quite different in scent from Michelia alba (former names here). Some of them even go as far as to include flowers that don't have discernible scents (Vera Wang claiming calla lily). Their scent descriptions may mention a genus but we here should not use what they say as fact. It is important to note that those are their claims and their "jasmine" or their "rose" is very ambiguous and could refer to dozens of different types. I think it is wrong for an encyclopedia to claim that is exactly what they use. What we should do is write it in the article as "these are the flower essence claim to be used". Unless we have a lab tested result with detailed analysis of the ingredients, I don't think we should list the flowers included as fact, but as what the fragrance designer claims to be in use.

--Dara (talk) 21:50, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]