Talk:Jonna Doolittle Hoppes

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 April 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) on 26 January 2013 with the comment: Doesn't meet WP:MILPEOPLE It was contested by Skeet Shooter (talk · contribs) on 2013-01-26 with the comment: Meets WP:GNP. See talk page for details

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I initially thought people who wrote about military history were appropriate for WikiProject Military history but that appears to be incorrect. I'll remove the reference to this project in the talk page. I'll also remove the request for deletion as I believe the article is still notable. Skeet Shooter (talk) 13:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same appears to be true for WikiProject Aviation, so I removed the template for that project as well. Skeet Shooter (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day Skeet Shooter. You're not getting the impression that there might be a question about her notability now that two large Wikiprojects have stated she doesn't meet their notability guidelines? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peacemaker. No, I didn't get that impression. I thought the issue was meeting the criteria for a specific WikiProject. When I looked at the notability guidelines you pointed me to, I thought the issue was that the subject of the article had not served in the military and so was unsuitable for the WikiProject Military history. Similarly, the subject is not a pilot, so I removed the article from WPAVIATION on my own. Someone from the California WikiProject added their template, so I assumed that editor thought the subject was notable. The subject is the author of two books, and I provided multiple references from reliable civilian and military newspapers discussing her work. I thought that met WP:GNP and WP:SPIP. Skeet Shooter (talk)

I updated the lead and career sections to strengthen the subject's notability as an author. Skeet Shooter (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jonna Doolittle Hoppes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130212131943/http://www.afhistoricalfoundation.org/aboutus/Board_of_Directors.asp to http://www.afhistoricalfoundation.org/aboutus/Board_of_Directors.asp
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://airandspace.si.edu/events/eventDetail.cfm?eventID=418
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://jimmydoolittlemuseum.org/wingsofvalorflyer.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://assets.mediaspanonline.com/prod/4056856/ala_02052010A16.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425114716/http://dod.org/Products/Jake-DeShazers-Extraordinary-Journey-from-WWII-Doolittle-Raider-to-POW--to-Missionary-to-Japan--Part-I__DOD2045.aspx to http://www.dod.org/Products/Jake-DeShazers-Extraordinary-Journey-from-WWII-Doolittle-Raider-to-POW--to-Missionary-to-Japan--Part-I__DOD2045.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]