Talk:John de Breton

	John de Breton has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 17, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 11, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the medieval bishop John de Breton was credited with having written a legal treatise regarding statutes created after his death?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Herefordshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Herefordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Herefordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HerefordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HerefordshireTemplate:WikiProject HerefordshireHerefordshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism Low‑importance John de Breton is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Catholicism task list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Draft articles Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page) Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:John de Breton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 14:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "He served as a royal justice and sheriff before being nominted to Hereford." - nominated. Royal justice; can we link the courts?

• Yeah, but WHICH article? I'm not an expert on English judicial matters, and am not clear which court would be the predecessor here. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speaking as somebody who is, I'd go for the Court of King's Bench, widely considered the more senior of the two (although I've always rooted for the Common Pleas, assumpsit debate aside). Ironholds (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Linked. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "sheriff of Herefordshire " - "Sheriff of Herefordshire

• Fixed and linked. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "From this point until after the Battle of Evesham in 1265, Breton does not appear in the records, but shortly after the conclusion of the battle, he once more appears, this time with a grant of royal safeguarding" - "Breton does not appear in the records from this point until after the Battle of Evesham in 1265, when he is noted as holding a grant of royal safeguarding"

• Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "at first at Court of Common Pleas, and then at the King's Bench from 1268" - "first in the Court of Common Pleas, and then at the King's Bench from 1268"

• Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• ", he longer served as a royal justice" - ", he no longer served as a royal justice"

• Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]