Talk:John S. Clarke

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	John S. Clarke has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 15, 2023 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 30, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British lion tamer and politician John Smith Clarke cured Lenin's dog of an illness?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anti-war Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

It appears that "John Clarke" was more commonly referred to as John S. Clarke or John Smith Clarke in both contemporary news reports and subsequent biographies, including the ODNB (which uses John Smith Clarke). Should the article title be changed to reflect that? Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 19:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Unexpectedlydian: Let's see... The available-online third-party sources cited here that mention him (which, for a would-be GA, I'm assuming are a good representation of sources overall) have 6 "John Smith Clarke", 14 "John S. Clarke", 1 (Three Scottish Poets) refuses to load. Pen Pictures of Russia Under the Red Terror, while cited as "Smith", actually has "S." on the title page. So I would support a move to "S." based on that. @MapReader: You moved this from "John Smith Clarke" in 2017. Do you have any thoughts? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 09:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"John Smith Clarke" would be appropriate if he had a two-part surname, but he doesn't - "Smith" is his middle name, and he is routinely referred to as "Mr Clarke" in contemporary sources. So I wouldn't support moving back to John Smith Clarke. It's true that a fair few sources include his middle initial, at least upon first reference or in the titles of his articles etc., but whether this is sufficient to conclude that the initial is part of his Commonname is debateable? MapReader (talk) 09:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INITS advises, Generally, use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources: if that is with a middle name or initials, make the Wikipedia article title conform to that format. No sources cited in this article say just "John Clarke", and more say "John S. Clarke" than "John Smith Clarke", so "S." would seem to be the way to go. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 10:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both, I can’t recall coming across any sources which called him just “John Clarke”. I’d be keen to change the article title. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 10:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, his own publications - for the attribution of which, one assumes he made the decision - are the most authoritative source, and these all include the initial rather than the name. So if there is a move I would suggest adding the initial. MapReader (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you both for your help. I’m happy to change the name of the article later on today. Not sure how it’ll affect the GA nom, but if it breaks I’ll re-submit. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 13:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MapReader, @Tamzin, just confirming the page has now been renamed. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 11:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Unexpectedlydian: Great! Although since that left John S. Clarke redirecting to John S. Clarke (socialist politician), it made the disambiguator in the title unnecessary. Since that's an admin/pagemover-only move, I've gone ahead and done it for you. And then added the appropriate hatnote. Look good to you? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 07:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin Awesome, thanks so much! Looks good to me :) Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 10:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]