Talk:Islamic dietary laws

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Islamic dietary laws article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-08. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Islam Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I think that donkey halal is 46.22.24.203 (talk) 23:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They are not 46.22.24.203 (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This paragraph repeats information previously mentioned. Should it be removed completely? Tigerboy1966  07:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done a bit of restructuring and merged the sections on slaughter. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first line in this section mentions a statement (The halal way of slaughter has been considered to be healthier and more hygienic.[citation needed] ) which is stated as a fact. However there is no evidence provided for such nor is there any citation. As such I recommend that this sentence should be removed as it is more in line with opinion rather than any fact as no evidence of such is provided. 154.20.10.104 (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Animals hunted by trained birds and animals" Is it "Animals hunted by trained (birds and animals)", which could be rephrased as "Animals hunted by trained animals e.g. birds" OR Is it "Animals hunted by (trained birds) and animals", which could be rephrased as "Animals hunted by other animals e.g. trained birds" 36.93.37.154 (talk) 04:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]