Talk:Inverted-F antenna/GA1

GA Review

GA toolbox
  • Copyvio detector
  • Authorship
  • External links
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Samtar (talk · contribs) 17:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Well thanks for reviewing Samtar! SpinningSpark 18:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

A good article is—

  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.[1]
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[3] and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. [4]
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. [5]
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.[6]

Review

  1. Well-written:
    2. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (prose) Fully meets 1a criteria. Pass Pass
    (b) (MoS) Fully meets 1b criteria. Pass Pass
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (references) Article contains a list of all references set out as per Wikipedia:FNNR, thus satisfying criteria 2a. Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources) All sourced considered reliable to section 2b standards. Pass Pass
    (c) (original research) The article does not contain any original research. Pass Pass
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (major aspects) Article contains a broad overview of the major aspects of the subject. Pass Pass
    (b) (focused) The summary style is not overly detailed yet focused. Pass Pass
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
    5. Notes Result
    The entire article is written in a neutral manner. Pass Pass
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
    6. Notes Result
    Article has been stable without major changes due to dispute. Pass Pass
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. Criteria Notes Result
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) Fully meets 6a criteria. Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) Use of five appropriate images with informative captions. Pass Pass

Result

Result Notes
Pass Pass Article meets GA criteria.

Discussion

Well done SpinningSpark - this article flew through the GA criteria! Keep up the good work, and never stop striving to improve samtar {t} 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional notes

  1. ^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
  2. ^ Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.
  3. ^ This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
  4. ^ Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
  5. ^ Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
  6. ^ The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Inverted-F_antenna/GA1&oldid=1145828603"