Talk:Horizon 2020

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

European Union Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles Economics Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Open Access High‑importance Horizon 2020 is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles High This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Open Access to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Creative Commons licensing (to replace Creative Commons license); Creative Commons Attribution License (currently a redirect), reproducible research (currently a redirect), supplementary material. Scholarly Open Access (currently a redirect) Cleanup : Access2Research Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stub-Class Open access articles. Other : add {{WikiProject Open Access}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess; Check media files uploaded by the Open Access Media Importer for missing or incomplete categorization or lack of descriptions, or put the files into suitable Wikipedia articles. See also recent uploads of open-access files more generally.

Material from Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development was split to Horizon 2020 on 16:34, 26 December 2016 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development.

In reference to the discussion held here. I believe that this article satisfies notability criteria, and should not be merged or deleted. It cites various independent publications, and is notable not only for the unprecedented size of the funding distributed, but also for being embroiled in various issues of EU foreign policy (e.g. with Switzerland and Israel). I think if Wikipedia were to lack an article devoted to this project it would be a large omission. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Yep, we absolutely need an article on the Framework programmes, but an article on each 7 year version of it is WP:UNDUE. We don't do this for other funding agencies (like NIH or NSF) either (and for good reason). --Randykitty (talk) 13:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]