Talk:French submarine Amiral Bourgois

French submarine Amiral Bourgois has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 22, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force European military history task force French military history task force World War I task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:French submarine Amiral Bourgois/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 07:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Claiming this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to this, it looks to be in pretty good order, with only one, maybe two, issues:

• The treatment of the installed power & propulsion seems inconsistent. When dealing with the diesel engines, it seems as they are treated in combination but when discussing the electric engines, these are treated in isolation, even though there are two engines of both types. Maybe this is to avoid hewing too closely to the source?
• Dupelinks: stern, sea trials
• Sources look fine
• Image check is OK

That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 01:44, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks all fine, passing as GA now as I believe the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]