Talk:Employsure

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance Employsure is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. New Zealand This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Organizations Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on October 4 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on June 19 2020. The result of the discussion was merge to Peninsula Business Services.

It has come to my attention that this article is full to the brim with native advertising. The use of undisclosed native advertising, especially by the subject of the article (who appears to be the person responsible for those edits) is in breach of the WP:NOT policy. Native advertising has been removed, as well as the claims made within this article that are exclusively made through citation of native advertising.

Jack4576 (talk) 02:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting the claim made by the subject of the article regarding pro-bono work for NPOV reasons. The claim is only supported by a primary source published by the subject of the article. There should be a secondary source, otherwise an entry detailing 'Employsure's pro-bono' work might be misleading, as there is no way to know whether Employsure actually has a reputation for pro-bono work.

The citation provided for the dogs & cats home charity contains no actual evidence that pro-bono services are provided. The citation only details the fact that Employsure is a sponsor. Therefore I have deleted that claim and citation also.

Jack4576 (talk) 02:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am deleting a number of claims made within the 'Awards' section of the article for the following reasons: The first claim is supported by a primary source only, a website run by the subject of the article. This is inappropriate for wikipedia articles as they are supposed to be NPOV. The second link to support this claim, 'anthillonline' is SPONSORED CONTENT, i.e. a native advertising website designed to impersonate a news website (or perhaps, a news website that almost exclusively publishes Native Advertising). In any event, the winning of the 'growth company of the year 2015' award is unremarkable.

I am removing the 'business services growth company of the year' award, firstly because it is unremarkable to the general wikipedia reader, and secondly because it is only supported by (multiple) primary sources; one from the award giver itself (Deloitte), and the other from the article's subject. In the interests of NPOV I am removing this claim.

I am removing the award claim relating to hcamag, as the firm was only "one of" a number of winners from a magazine that seems relatively unimportant and would be unremarkable to the typical wikipedia reader. In the interests of furthering the NPOV objective of this article I have removed this claim.

The last claim, regarding the bronze award is unsupported by any workign citation. Given the other issues that were also raised, I am removing this claim also for NPOV

Jack4576 (talk) 14:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently tried to refactor the subsidiary/parent company information from the opening paragraph, into this article's Infobox to reduce clutter in the opening paragraph. Unfortunately one of the other editors keeps reverting this edit. Will attempt to contact the other editor to stop this from happening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack4576 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be re-written to reflect the WP:NPOV policy. Presently the article reads as if it was written by a staff member of the article subject.

From the talk discussion below, signed 'Roland' that does indeed appear to be the case.

Jack4576 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:36, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it is about a notable Australia-based company that has received extensive media coverage and that has won multiple awards in 2015 and 2016 including the most prestigious ones. This page has been created following the same template as other Australia-based company that do not provide references and are less notable. There is only informative content on this page, nothing commercial, and Employsure's page will be beneficial to thousands of people that are looking for more information about this company on Google at the moment. The company gets a lot of inquiries every day. Also the page uses a lot of references to support the facts and figures quoted in the article. I believe this page deserves to be live as many other pages about businesses are live and are not complying as much as this one. Also it seems that there was a lot of confusion about this page as at least two moderators checked it. One deleted some references and then another one checked the page and saw that the content was not supported by references. The page as it was in September was very comprehensive and full of references, it has been deleted because in October one moderator started to delete some notable references. So if you check the page make sure to check the page as it was in September and not the latest version as part of the references and content were deleted.

However, I have produced new content that I would like to submit to you so you can review and check if it complies with Wikipedia policies. Please let me know how I can submit the new content. I hope you will take my message in consideration.

Regards

Ben

--Benscemama (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Just Chilling,

We're not sure why our page has the noindex tags on it (mobile & desktop versions) and why we've been having problems publishing it?

We've provided new content for the page, included our awards and linked to external references etc...

Can we please get some love from Wikipedia, Please let us know what we can do to have the page appear in the index.

We don't believe we've done anything that violates the guidelines, it's a bit strange that we're getting treated like that.

Look forward to hearing from you

Thanks, Roland — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.145.241 (talk) 23:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which noindex tags? Just Chilling (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Employsure Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]