This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move the job lot. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
– Each of these pages now contains a basic introduction to the nature of the role – ready for expansion and development – rather than merely a list. Additionally, the rest of their siblings are already at the form suggested. DBD 17:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Seems reasonable. Jenks24 (talk) 04:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I too see they are reasonable moves. Scrivener-uki (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support. Seems to be a good idea regarding the deans, but there are other lists (for example bishops) out there. WP:NCLL and the Missing Manual chapter 13 section 1.2.2 would appear to suggest the "List of ..." form, but probably consistency wins out.
Reply: The hope is to have well-developed articles over lists. I've started, but yes there is plenty of work to be done! DBD 18:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.