Talk:Chamaesyce

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The opening paragraph says Chamaesyce is a genus, but then the paragraph continues with "Specifically, this group now belongs to Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce section Anisophyllum". Based on that it sounds like Chamaesyce is a subgenus. But then the paragraph ends with "Taxonomically speaking, Chamaesyce is considered a synonym of Euphorbia". By, what seems to be accepted taxonomy, Chamamaesyce is a subgenus of Euphorbia and under current classification ideas for Euphorbia, Chamamaesyce is not a synonym of Euphorbia. Davefoc (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]