Talk:Bund Bull

Former good article nomineeBund Bull was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 21, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Arturo Di Modica's Bund Bull was modelled after both Wall Street's Charging Bull and the Chinese zodiac's Ox?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bund Bull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320091907/http://english.eastday.com/e/100724/u1a5350586.html to http://english.eastday.com/e/100724/u1a5350586.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problem for local authorities?

"The Bull's popularity has been a problem for local authorities."

No source for this, and it is not mentioned in the rest of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.93.74 (talk) 22:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self-contradicting size claims?

"actually it is 17.1-foot (5.2 m) long and 10.5-foot (3.2 m) tall." There doesn't seem to be a source for this, and it contradicts the (sourced) size quoted later in the article: "At 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) tall, 3.3 metres (11 ft) long and 2.5 tonnes (2.7 tons)" 180.150.63.179 (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bund_Bull&oldid=1206476348"