Talk:Blairgowrie and Rattray

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been vandalised so much it's almost impossible to repair. Mummymonkey 17:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just checked the reference and it doesn't mention Ray Fields saying "It's all in a day's work, baby" anywhere... I'll bet the rest of the page is equally as vandalised. I don't think for an instant that Peter Pan has won the Citizen of the Year award either! 77.99.125.25 (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Sad, this stuff. Why not just revert the lot to the last BlairBEar update? seems sound enough. Nice place, Blairgowrie. to nice to let some dickhead get away with trashing it, even in a trash-hepa like wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.92.88 (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cut quite a bit of unsourced information which made the article read like a tourist guide. Anyone wishing to add more information, please make sure it is sourced and relevant in terms of an encyclopedia entry. ^OohBunnies! Leave a message 06:49, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blairgowrie and Rattray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090916182939/http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/publications-and-data to http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/publications-and-data

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blairgowrie and Rattray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322053159/http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainArea=blairgowrie&mainLevel=Locality to http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/browser/profile.jsp?profile=Population&mainArea=blairgowrie&mainLevel=Locality

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should Blairgowrie and Rattray be split into separate articles or does Blairgowrie have too much overlap with this? given some maps show "Blairgowrie and Rattray". I have created Draft:Blairgowrie, Perth and Kinross and Draft:Rattray, Perth And Kinross but more content should be moved from here if split. Per WP:GEOLAND its a civil parish and former burgh so is clearly notable. If its though the overlap with Blairgowrie is too great then it could be split to something like Blairgowrie (parish) which could also cover the former burgh. Blairgowrie is on 4[1] of my missing article lists namely User:Crouch, Swale/A-Z Mini, User:Crouch, Swale/A-Z bold places, User:Crouch, Swale/Bot settlements and User:Crouch, Swale/Scottish localities. Rattray is on 2[2] of my missing article lists namely User:Crouch, Swale/A-Z Mini and User:Crouch, Swale/A-Z bold places. There was discussion in 2019 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland/Archive 13#Dunkeld and Birnam where it was agreed those should be separate. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support They should be separate. Dormskirk (talk) 19:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]