Talk:Aunite
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 17 November 2012. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Comments
- A reliable, if amateur source has been deleted with valuable comment on this topic. Please replace. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 17:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- The source has no basis for being considered reliable, as explained at WP:RSN. While we are at it, the term is not notable, being used one time in one primary source, and not receiving any reliable coverage since then - obviously Danish vikings are notable, but it is not necessary to have a separate page for every word used to describe them in every single source. Agricolae (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- The Aunites weren't the Vikings Agricolae. Now I've told you before about the Mumbo-Jumbo. My reply on the RSN board awaits a sensible response. Feeling Chatti? Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 17:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- The source has no basis for being considered reliable, as explained at WP:RSN. While we are at it, the term is not notable, being used one time in one primary source, and not receiving any reliable coverage since then - obviously Danish vikings are notable, but it is not necessary to have a separate page for every word used to describe them in every single source. Agricolae (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)