Talk:AnyKode Marilou

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Robotics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Hi Jungle, and welcome to Wikipedia, I'm very glad you're here, because we need more people around who have expertise in robotics. For some reason, people don't let me make the rules around here :) And here are the rules: in order not to have this article deleted, we need to deal with three problems. This is probably the minimum we need:

• Either the product or your company needs to have been mentioned in a reliable source, such as a newspaper or book. A few web sites are considered reliable sources around here, but not many.
• If we can only find one such source, it needs to be pretty spectacular. It needs to make an argument that your product is important in the industry, and it needs to make the case believably. That's called notability.
• If we can fix those two problems, then the article needs to be largely based on what we can get from the reliable sources. The article needs to have a balanced tone, and not appear to be promotional. This is a longer-term project; the first two points have to be addressed immediately. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 13:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. My position is, I don't want this information to disappear; what I want is to see a solid discussion and comparison of the different robotics simulators. This would help Wikipedia a lot; our coverage of robotics is not good. Some of the detailed things that we can't find references for might belong at en.wikiversity.org instead of here; I'm not sure, but I think they would really like this. When we can find references that back up what's being said about your simulator and the other simulators, we should be able to keep all of the material, although some of the more technical material should probably be at en.wikibooks.org, but that's okay, we can link to wikibooks so that people will be able to read it. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 14:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just would like to add my two cents in saying that articles like this are very helpful for the people like me interested in robotics that use Wikipedia as a useful tool. If it gets deleted, Wikipedia would be less useful. Sometimes rules have to serve the user and not the opposite. My opinion KansaiRobot from Japan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.146.250.40 (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AnyKode Marilou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110826032500/http://revistabme.eia.edu.co/numeros/4/art/26-33%20(Interfaz%20cerebro%20computadora).pdf to http://revistabme.eia.edu.co/numeros/4/art/26-33%20%28Interfaz%20cerebro%20computadora%29.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723054451/http://www.corebots.net/project.html to http://www.corebots.net/project.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110830064703/http://support.intempora.com/menu-tutorials/menu-tutorials/simulation-engine to http://support.intempora.com/menu-tutorials/menu-tutorials/simulation-engine

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]