Talk:Ahunui

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France: French communes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject French communes, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Polynesia: French Polynesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the French Polynesia work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Islands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles Overseas France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

}}

According to the German Wikipedia Article http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahunui, Ahuni is at 19° 37′ S, 140° 23′ W. Fangataufa is an atoll at 22°15′S 138°45′W. This agrees with the map at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Karta_FP_Tuamotus_isl.PNG which shows them as two separate atolls. However, this article says Fanga-taufa is another name for Ahuni, and that Ahuni is located at 22°15′S 138°45′W (basically right next to Fangataufa). Should this be fixed to be consistent? I think this article is wrong (in both the location, and also that Ahuni is also called Fanga-taufa), but I'm not absolutely certain.

- Looks like someone has now corrected the location. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterS6g (talk • contribs) 19:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before slandering and claiming that material is unsourced, anyone in Wikipedia has to give a chance! All material I used in Tuamotu Atolls is translated from German and French Wikipedia articles mainly. I have no idea why certain users are rude upfront! Mohonu

The issue have been discussed in [1] and [2]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely because there is Google there is no need to overwhelm the reader of Wikipedia articles with excess citations in the text. A simple google of "tuamotu-ahunui-pipi" would have led you (User:Otolemur crassicaudatus) to the German Wikipedia, among Wikipedias in many other languages. (The same thing applies for googling "ahunui-hao-commune") Regarding the Ahunui articles in those languages. I don't see such cramming of references in their articles. Only after googling and after ending up with a negative result should one conclude that it is original and/or unsourced and then add the tag.Mohonu (talk) 08:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The issue have been discussed in [3] and [4]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image of this atoll was sourced as a NASA picture. Credit was given to NASA in the caption as per NASA's specific request. Isn't false tagging a form of vandalism? Mohonu (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ahunui. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.oceandots.com/pacific/tuamotu/ahunui.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ahunui. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070228115907/http://www.pacific-image.pf/pages/boutic/dboutic_cdrom_sp132.html to http://www.pacific-image.pf/pages/boutic/dboutic_cdrom_sp132.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]