Talk:Academy for Mathematics, Science, and Engineering

Academy for Mathematics, Science, and Engineering was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 22, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Schools Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Reasoning for assessment: Needs more citations as there are some unverified claims here. The article also needs to be updated to a more current school year, preferably 2007-2008. — Calebrw (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply] New Jersey Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No 2401:4900:422E:4AC6:A80E:843E:DE19:82C6 (talk) 12:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Academy for Mathematics, Science, and Engineering/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 07:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "Curriculum by Year" sections are entirely unsourced, as are the product development sequence (WP:GACR 2c), and these sections are in any case far too detailed to be of general interest in an encyclopedia article (GACR 3b).

References 20 (Tran petition), 21-22 (Niche), and 23 (SchoolDigger) all appear to be unreliable. References 31–37 (Middle States Association to MHRD admissions) all appear to be primary, as do references 39 (important dates) and 40 (enrollment). Other dubious or primary references include 44 (AMSE Info Session), 46 (state dept of education), 47 (school profile), 48 (AMSE grad req), 49 (UCSB paper that doesn't mention the school), and all the ones after that (all primary). That leaves the entire "Academics" section, the longest of the article, without any good sources (GACR 2b).

The image of the banner showing the school logo appears to be a copyright violation, as the logo itself is only usable under fair use (the earlier image), there is no fair use justification for having two versions of the logo, and taking a photo of a copyrighted image does not invalidate its copyright (GACR 6a).

I think this is very far from meeting Good Article criteria 2 and 3, and as such can be a quick fail (WP:GAFAIL #1). —David Eppstein (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]