Talk:2022 Historic Grand Prix of Monaco

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Motorsport This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. European Microstates: Monaco This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco.

Hi there. Upon reviewing this page for the new page patrol, I discovered that the Report section contains a substantial amount of text, that largely uncited. I've reviewed the text for copyright violations and didn't find any. Accordingly I've tagged the section with the {{more citations needed}} template, and would appreciate it if anyone who has this article on their watchlist could either provide appropriate inline citations, or remove text that may possibly be original research. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sideswipe. Thank you for taking the time to review this article! I agree that I should have given more sources in the Report section; this is an oversight on my part, as I composed it while the event took place but didn't go back later once mainstream articles were available. I've added a task to my schedule to find more sources, but this won't be for a few days.

However, I don't believe that my text comes under WP:OR, as everything that I wrote about can be seen objectively in the broadcast. The broadcast (which is available on YouTube) meets the "published" and "accessible" criteria for a reliable source according to WP:PUBLISH, so I will also cite this as a general reference when I get round to it. Best wishes, DanTickner (talk) 00:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]