Talk:2015 Senegal mid-air collision

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Africa: Equatorial Guinea / Senegal

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Equatorial Guinea.
	Senegal portal This article is supported by WikiProject Senegal.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ceiba Intercontinental Airlines Flight 71. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151024131523/http://www.bea.aero/en/enquetes/6v.aim/6v.aim.php to http://www.bea.aero/en/enquetes/6v.aim/6v.aim.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151016160657/http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/6v.aim/6v.aim.php to http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/6v.aim/6v.aim.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 11:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ceiba Intercontinental Airlines Flight 71 → 2015 Senegal mid-air collision – Mid-air collisions are rare events that stand out among all other air accidents, therefore a title that refer to the event as such would be a lot more meaningful (see for example 2002 Überlingen mid-air collision, 1996 Charkhi Dadri mid-air collision and others). WP:AATF allows for deviations from the standard format, if more common names exist, and the article itself (including many sources) explicitly mentions 'Senegal' and 'collision', when referring to the accident. -- Deeday-UK (talk) 15:35, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in the collision in question, Ceiba Flight 71 is the one the made it safely to the ground. It was the other aircraft (without a flight number) that crashed with the loss of all on board; another reason why the current title is inadequate. --Deeday-UK (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dont have a problem with the change as you say it reflects that more than one aircraft was involved. MilborneOne (talk) 10:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Did the crew of the CEIBA know what happened?

It's not clear to me from the current version of the article if the crew of the CEIBA knew they had a mid air collision with another aircraft. Or if they didn't what they believed had happened. My original thought was clearly they didn't know since I assumed standard practice even when everything is currently operating normally after such an event is to proceed to the nearest airport you can safely land, since you never know what may have broken and what may further deteriorate in flight, I mean part of their winglet was missing. I assume they only heard a noise and maybe observed the "brief oscillation and an uncommanded yaw" but otherwise had no clue what had happened (perhaps thinking it was a bird strike or something) as everything seemed okay and so decided it was important but not urgent so proceeded to their base rather than the nearest airport they could land at or their origin destination (if they felt there was nothing to worry about at all). But maybe I'm wrong. It would be helpful if this could be clarified in the article, and also especially if they did know, if there was any controversy over their decision. (Just because it was fine doesn't mean it was a good idea.) Nil Einne (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]