User contributions for Krosero
9 May 2022
- 17:5817:58, 9 May 2022 diff hist +527 User talk:Jayron32 →Need to reopen or formally close an ANI: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:4617:46, 9 May 2022 diff hist +366 User talk:Iamreallygoodatcheckers →72 hour archival?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:2302:23, 9 May 2022 diff hist +653 User talk:Iamreallygoodatcheckers →72 hour archival?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:1602:16, 9 May 2022 diff hist +1,098 User talk:Jayron32 →Need to reopen or formally close an ANI: new section
8 May 2022
- 13:0513:05, 8 May 2022 diff hist +48 User talk:Iamreallygoodatcheckers →72 hour archival?: agreed
- 12:0912:09, 8 May 2022 diff hist +279 User talk:Iamreallygoodatcheckers →72 hour archival?: new section
3 May 2022
- 10:1210:12, 3 May 2022 diff hist +153 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Reply 2: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3301:33, 3 May 2022 diff hist +7 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →User:Tennisedu: moving reply to bottom of section
- 01:2801:28, 3 May 2022 diff hist +2,030 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Discussion: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2701:27, 3 May 2022 diff hist +269 User talk:Wolbo request about tennis content
28 April 2022
- 13:0813:08, 28 April 2022 diff hist +241 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3401:34, 28 April 2022 diff hist +1,147 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
26 April 2022
- 19:4119:41, 26 April 2022 diff hist +1,127 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
25 April 2022
- 18:3718:37, 25 April 2022 diff hist +58 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: clarification
- 18:3418:34, 25 April 2022 diff hist +1,765 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:1413:14, 25 April 2022 diff hist +225 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: one place for discussion
- 11:2511:25, 25 April 2022 diff hist +7,947 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: longstanding patterns, and 1965 money as an example
23 April 2022
- 22:4822:48, 23 April 2022 diff hist +200 User talk:Tennishistory1877 No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 April 2022
- 15:2515:25, 20 April 2022 diff hist +165 User talk:Krosero →Tennis problems: Reply Tag: Reply
19 April 2022
- 17:4817:48, 19 April 2022 diff hist +154 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: ping
- 17:4517:45, 19 April 2022 diff hist +2,139 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Lew Hoad page misinformation, 1962 poll
- 17:3517:35, 19 April 2022 diff hist +9 m User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures
- 16:5316:53, 19 April 2022 diff hist −18 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures
- 16:5116:51, 19 April 2022 diff hist +2,638 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:0002:00, 19 April 2022 diff hist +28 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures
- 01:5901:59, 19 April 2022 diff hist +1,505 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Procedures: Reply Tag: Reply
12 March 2022
- 16:3116:31, 12 March 2022 diff hist +3,767 User talk:Johnuniq →Why the venom?: Lew Hoad pages
24 November 2021
- 16:3516:35, 24 November 2021 diff hist +1,033 Talk:Top ten ranked male tennis players (1912–1972) →1962 UPI Pro Ranking: fails more than one criteria
23 November 2021
- 13:5013:50, 23 November 2021 diff hist −423 World number 1 ranked male tennis players →1913–present: As discussed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Top_ten_ranked_male_tennis_players_(1913%E2%80%931972)#1962_UPI_Pro_Ranking (see also discussions of this UPI poll in archived discussions from this page)
22 November 2021
- 15:3015:30, 22 November 2021 diff hist +1,602 Talk:Top ten ranked male tennis players (1912–1972) →1962 UPI Pro Ranking: undue weight and inaccurate, etc
21 November 2021
- 18:2118:21, 21 November 2021 diff hist +493 Talk:Top ten ranked male tennis players (1912–1972) →1962 UPI Pro Ranking: British Lawn Tennis reader polls
- 17:5917:59, 21 November 2021 diff hist +2,896 Talk:Top ten ranked male tennis players (1912–1972) →1962 UPI Pro Ranking: non-tennis or general-sports sources
25 October 2021
- 20:1520:15, 25 October 2021 diff hist +183 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Further discussion: redundant columns
- 00:2700:27, 25 October 2021 diff hist +1,978 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Further discussion: piecemeal changes; pro tennis sources
24 October 2021
- 21:3421:34, 24 October 2021 diff hist +14 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Further discussion: clarity
- 21:0721:07, 24 October 2021 diff hist +5,529 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Further discussion: columns should generally have 1 name
- 14:1014:10, 24 October 2021 diff hist +595 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Further discussion: choices to make
21 October 2021
- 13:2413:24, 21 October 2021 diff hist +1,030 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Survey 2: removal of columns
20 October 2021
- 20:5720:57, 20 October 2021 diff hist +3 m Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Discussion
- 20:5320:53, 20 October 2021 diff hist +4,210 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Discussion: might be a controversial article either way
19 October 2021
- 19:1719:17, 19 October 2021 diff hist +773 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →1953: agreed Kramer should be alone
- 15:5215:52, 19 October 2021 diff hist +1,355 Talk:World number 1 ranked male tennis players →Discussion: support pro-amateur columns
11 June 2021
- 11:3811:38, 11 June 2021 diff hist +839 User talk:Wolbo →Getting close to an ANI with the two tennis editors: internal warnings
- 03:0103:01, 11 June 2021 diff hist +921 User talk:Fyunck(click) →Your judgement: still go ahead
- 01:3501:35, 11 June 2021 diff hist +1,273 User talk:Fyunck(click) →Your judgement: why wait
10 June 2021
- 22:2222:22, 10 June 2021 diff hist +2,287 User talk:Tennishistory1877 →Editor dispute must stop: not simply two editors warring
- 22:2122:21, 10 June 2021 diff hist +2,288 User talk:Wolbo →Getting close to an ANI with the two tennis editors: not two editors simply warring
- 18:2118:21, 10 June 2021 diff hist +205 Rod Laver Undid revision 1027874072 by Tennisedu (talk) the $1 million mark was a milestone and a very famous one, not a random midcareer total such as we've been removing, but an even mark, or goalpost Tag: Undo
9 June 2021
- 21:4221:42, 9 June 2021 diff hist +204 Talk:Lew Hoad No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:5620:56, 9 June 2021 diff hist +2,024 Talk:Lew Hoad →RfC: misrepresentations
