User contributions for Tjo3ya
30 November 2021
- 17:2317:23, 30 November 2021 diff hist +2,764 Talk:Ellipsis (linguistics) →POV issue with catenas: Responding to Kacjo and Botterweg
10 November 2021
- 04:4604:46, 10 November 2021 diff hist +311 Talk:Ellipsis (linguistics) →POV issue with catenas: Easy to understand.
- 04:3404:34, 10 November 2021 diff hist −9 m Talk:Determiner phrase →POV issue with catenas: typo
- 04:3204:32, 10 November 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Determiner phrase →POV issue with catenas: catena unit
- 04:3104:31, 10 November 2021 diff hist +430 Talk:Determiner phrase →POV issue with catenas: Relevance of the catena unit
- 04:2704:27, 10 November 2021 diff hist 0 m Determiner phrase →The competing analyses: Minor corrections to spelling
- 02:5402:54, 10 November 2021 diff hist +82 Talk:Ellipsis (linguistics) →POV issue with catenas
- 02:5302:53, 10 November 2021 diff hist +332 Talk:Ellipsis (linguistics) →POV issue with catenas: The catena concept is validted in numerous prominent linguistics articles.
- 02:5202:52, 10 November 2021 diff hist +1,161 Ellipsis (linguistics) Undid revision 1054187773 by Botterweg14 (talk) The catena concept should not be removed. It is validated in many articles in prominent linguistics journals. Tag: Undo
13 October 2021
- 05:3205:32, 13 October 2021 diff hist −7 Determiner phrase Adjusting wording to provide a more accurate picture concerning the variation in positions, DP vs NP.
- 05:2205:22, 13 October 2021 diff hist −9 Determiner phrase The wording "virtually all" is not accurate. There are a number of approaches to syntax that reject the DP analysis in favor of the traditional NP analysis.
5 May 2021
- 02:3702:37, 5 May 2021 diff hist +482 Talk:Topicalization Poor quality of additions on split topicalization
3 May 2021
- 02:3102:31, 3 May 2021 diff hist −8 Predicate (grammar) organization Tag: Reverted
- 02:2802:28, 3 May 2021 diff hist −17 Predicate (grammar) organization Tag: Reverted
- 02:2702:27, 3 May 2021 diff hist −18 Predicate (grammar) organization Tag: Reverted
1 May 2021
- 03:5203:52, 1 May 2021 diff hist +4,258 Predicate (grammar) Restoring old section. It provides more content that is relevant and helpful. Tag: Reverted
- 03:2003:20, 1 May 2021 diff hist +579 Predicate (grammar) No edit summary
- 03:1503:15, 1 May 2021 diff hist +27 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 03:1103:11, 1 May 2021 diff hist +139 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 03:0703:07, 1 May 2021 diff hist +5 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 03:0503:05, 1 May 2021 diff hist +753 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 02:5502:55, 1 May 2021 diff hist +1,264 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 02:4802:48, 1 May 2021 diff hist −3,245 Determiner phrase →In languages without overt determiners: Removing overlook specific content. Some sort of appropriate lead-in would be necessary in order to include that content.
- 02:3802:38, 1 May 2021 diff hist −2,767 Verb phrase ellipsis →Evidence for antecedent-contained deletion in language acquisition: Removing overly specific information -- summarizing the results of a research article are not appropriate for an encyclopedia
- 02:2802:28, 1 May 2021 diff hist −6,283 Verb phrase ellipsis →VP ellipsis in Japanese: Removing content that is hardly accessible. The examples are ugly, extending over two lines. The trees need glosses.
- 02:1602:16, 1 May 2021 diff hist −10,846 Syntactic movement Removing overly specific and esoteric content
30 April 2021
- 23:4223:42, 30 April 2021 diff hist −5,398 Syntactic category Removing overly specific and esoteric content
- 23:3023:30, 30 April 2021 diff hist −10,838 Topicalization Cutting sloppy and incoherent content Tag: Reverted
13 April 2021
- 06:3806:38, 13 April 2021 diff hist +2,131 Talk:Predicate (grammar) →NPOV and sources contradicting claims: Responding to Botterweg14
11 April 2021
- 10:3910:39, 11 April 2021 diff hist +80 Talk:Predicate (grammar) →NPOV and sources contradicting claims: signing off
- 10:3810:38, 11 April 2021 diff hist +2,083 Talk:Predicate (grammar) →NPOV and sources contradicting claims: Responding to Botterweg14
- 10:1410:14, 11 April 2021 diff hist +379 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0610:06, 11 April 2021 diff hist +3 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0510:05, 11 April 2021 diff hist +7 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0410:04, 11 April 2021 diff hist +2 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0210:02, 11 April 2021 diff hist +1 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0210:02, 11 April 2021 diff hist +1 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox →External links
- 10:0010:00, 11 April 2021 diff hist +1,235 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
5 April 2021
- 01:3701:37, 5 April 2021 diff hist +300 Predicate (grammar) Restoring old version of the article (again). This time I hope I have done it correctly. Tag: Reverted
- 01:1601:16, 5 April 2021 diff hist +1,566 User:Tjo3ya/sandbox No edit summary
- 01:1001:10, 5 April 2021 diff hist +5,068 Predicate (grammar) Restoring old version. The older version more clearly prepares the reader to understand the competing notions of predicates in school grammar as opposed to in modern theories of syntax and grammar. Tag: Reverted
- 01:0001:00, 5 April 2021 diff hist −34 Predicate (grammar) minor improvement to sentence Tag: Reverted
- 00:4700:47, 5 April 2021 diff hist +580 Predicate (grammar) Restoring old introduction. It more clearly establishes the competition between the two prominent notions encountered and thus better heads off potential for confusion. Tag: Reverted
18 January 2021
- 02:2402:24, 18 January 2021 diff hist −53 Catena (linguistics) Undid revision 1000937281 by 94.230.145.48 (talk)That's not appropriate in the introduction. Osborne is mentioned below in the history section. Tag: Undo
14 January 2021
- 07:0707:07, 14 January 2021 diff hist −357 Syntactic movement Undid revision 999937016 by 37.119.26.226 (talk)Citing a relatively recent source in the introduction of such an article is inappropriate. It smacks of advertising. Tag: Undo
3 January 2021
- 14:2014:20, 3 January 2021 diff hist +3 m Shifting (syntax) →Basic examples: minor correction in the example Tag: Manual revert
20 December 2020
- 04:4504:45, 20 December 2020 diff hist −3,171 C-command →Minimalism Criticism: There are a number of problems with the section, such as the use of single quotation mark instead of italics and the presence of an academic source cited in the running text instead of put in the footnotes.
- 04:4304:43, 20 December 2020 diff hist −3,380 C-command →Minimalist Definition: The section is redundant, confusing, and impenetrable. For it to be of value, it would need to explain how c-command in Minimalism is different from earlier notions of c-command.
4 December 2020
- 03:0003:00, 4 December 2020 diff hist 0 Predicate (grammar) typo
2 December 2020
- 04:0604:06, 2 December 2020 diff hist −120 C-command →Minimalism and c-command: Indicated section lacks content