User contributions for Seaniz
29 November 2016
- 11:4411:44, 29 November 2016 diff hist +184 Talk:Hajdúböszörmény No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21 November 2016
- 03:5003:50, 21 November 2016 diff hist +120 Talk:Sourdough No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
19 November 2016
- 03:2103:21, 19 November 2016 diff hist +6 m Influenza vaccine Replaced "small" with "very modest" to more accurately reflect the citation. "Authors' conclusions Influenza vaccines have a very modest effect in reducing influenza symptoms and working days lost in the general population, including pregnant women. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:1603:16, 19 November 2016 diff hist +275 Talk:Influenza vaccine No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
16 November 2016
- 20:5620:56, 16 November 2016 diff hist +730 Talk:Influenza vaccine replying to overly negative baseless criticism Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
- 12:2012:20, 16 November 2016 diff hist +50 N User:Seaniz/sandbox ←Created page with '{{User sandbox}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> hmm' current
- 12:1312:13, 16 November 2016 diff hist +186 User talk:Natureium No edit summary
- 12:1112:11, 16 November 2016 diff hist +56 User:Seaniz No edit summary current
- 12:1012:10, 16 November 2016 diff hist +386 User talk:Natureium No edit summary
- 12:0112:01, 16 November 2016 diff hist −4,484 User talk:Seaniz No edit summary current
- 11:5511:55, 16 November 2016 diff hist +356 Talk:Influenza vaccine →'New' articles that bring a new light to the flu vaccine
- 11:4911:49, 16 November 2016 diff hist +4,430 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy: replying to Ajpolino
- 11:1311:13, 16 November 2016 diff hist +831 Talk:Sourdough suggesting a possible new section == health ==
- 10:4210:42, 16 November 2016 diff hist +281 Talk:Sourdough →Congratulations on wonderful work
- 10:3510:35, 16 November 2016 diff hist +347 User talk:Ajpolino →Sourdough Starter
- 10:2210:22, 16 November 2016 diff hist +255 User talk:Seaniz replying to Ajpolino
- 10:0010:00, 16 November 2016 diff hist +2,433 User talk:Ajpolino started a new section or sourdough. With a recipe for sourdough starter.
- 09:5009:50, 16 November 2016 diff hist +1,541 User talk:Ajpolino replying about the Influenza vaccine page
15 November 2016
- 22:3722:37, 15 November 2016 diff hist +47 Influenza vaccine Just added the working days figure Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:2921:29, 15 November 2016 diff hist +479 Influenza vaccine Added a more accurate portrayal of the study already cited "vaccine was not effective" Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:1921:19, 15 November 2016 diff hist +433 User talk:Ajpolino →Influenza vaccine 'adults': new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:1820:18, 15 November 2016 diff hist +998 Talk:Influenza vaccine No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 20:0220:02, 15 November 2016 diff hist +665 Influenza vaccine Added the authors conclusions from the study that was quoted in 'adults' section. I'm not sure why it's constantly being removed. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:4312:43, 15 November 2016 diff hist +486 User talk:Jytdog No edit summary
- 12:3712:37, 15 November 2016 diff hist +532 User talk:Seaniz →Edit war warning
- 12:2812:28, 15 November 2016 diff hist −9 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Jytdog reported by User:seaniz (Result: )
- 12:2712:27, 15 November 2016 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Seaniz reported by User:Jytdog (Result: ): reversed the fields by accident
- 12:2612:26, 15 November 2016 diff hist −12 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Seaniz (Result: ): edited the 'user' field to include Jytdog
- 12:2312:23, 15 November 2016 diff hist +407 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 12:1412:14, 15 November 2016 diff hist +963 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
- 11:5811:58, 15 November 2016 diff hist +486 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 11:5111:51, 15 November 2016 diff hist +895 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 11:2911:29, 15 November 2016 diff hist +726 Influenza vaccine →Pregnancy: I'm not sure why a true representation of the diversity of studies available isn't preferred by the last editor. Perhaps s/he is employed by a pharmaceutical corporation or lobby group?
- 11:2511:25, 15 November 2016 diff hist +130 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 11:2311:23, 15 November 2016 diff hist +269 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 11:1811:18, 15 November 2016 diff hist +672 Influenza vaccine →Adults
- 11:1711:17, 15 November 2016 diff hist +347 Influenza vaccine →Adults: added a reference to a study that contradicted the one quoted about prevention of harm to patients via the vaccination of health care workers. Maybe, just maybe, read the article published this year (2016) before dismissing and deleting.
- 11:0511:05, 15 November 2016 diff hist +726 Influenza vaccine →Pregnancy: added contrary information form a competing study
- 10:5810:58, 15 November 2016 diff hist +5 Influenza vaccine →Adults
- 10:5510:55, 15 November 2016 diff hist +170 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
- 10:5110:51, 15 November 2016 diff hist +667 Influenza vaccine →Adults: added the conclusion that the authors made in the same study that was quoted later in this adult section
- 10:3310:33, 15 November 2016 diff hist +2 Influenza vaccine →Adults
- 10:3210:32, 15 November 2016 diff hist +756 Influenza vaccine →Adults: added the authors conclusions on the lack of usefulness of the influenza vaccine in adult populations from the same article referenced by the 4th footnote. followed the embeded link to the FULL article and then scrolled to the bottom.
- 10:0910:09, 15 November 2016 diff hist +684 Talk:Influenza vaccine →The true conclusions of the Cochrane metastudy
14 November 2016
- 21:3921:39, 14 November 2016 diff hist −920 Influenza vaccine →Pregnancy: The information posted in the second paragraph of the "pregnancy" section is from the VERY SAME source cited in the original paragraph on this topic. But it sounds a lot less positive ...
- 21:2121:21, 14 November 2016 diff hist +636 Influenza vaccine →Adults: added the implications for practice conclusions from the study source (source of the quotation for 16% vs 10% and 2% vs 1%) ... it makes more sense in the context of the full article.
- 21:0821:08, 14 November 2016 diff hist +836 Talk:Influenza vaccine No edit summary
- 20:5920:59, 14 November 2016 diff hist +350 Talk:Influenza vaccine →'New' articles that bring a new light to the flu vaccine
- 12:2712:27, 14 November 2016 diff hist +98 Talk:Influenza vaccine No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2612:26, 14 November 2016 diff hist +198 Talk:Influenza vaccine No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
