User contributions for Dark Shikari

6 April 2008

• 22:1122:11, 6 April 2008 diff hist −51‎ Smoked cheese ‎ Undid revision 203758691 by 77.249.176.232 (talk)
• 00:5300:53, 6 April 2008 diff hist +698‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture (2nd nomination) ‎No edit summary
• 00:1100:11, 6 April 2008 diff hist +572‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classical elements in popular culture (2nd nomination) ‎No edit summary

20 March 2008

• 22:5922:59, 20 March 2008 diff hist +4‎ X264 ‎ →‎Capabilities: adding newer options

14 March 2008

• 02:2302:23, 14 March 2008 diff hist +459‎ Talk:Advanced Video Coding ‎ →‎Hardware Requirement?

18 February 2008

• 23:2123:21, 18 February 2008 diff hist −1‎ m Advanced Video Coding ‎ <oops, cut off my edit summary> Elecard's film grain optimization is NOT FGM. FGM is not supported by any existing encoder or decoder, including the reference.
• 23:1923:19, 18 February 2008 diff hist −1‎ Advanced Video Coding ‎ Elecard's film grain optimization is NOT
• 10:2410:24, 18 February 2008 diff hist +278‎ Talk:Eve Online ‎ →‎Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
• 10:2310:23, 18 February 2008 diff hist −312‎ Eve Online ‎ If no conclusion was reached, why are you still inserting content that violates the verifiability guidelines? Reverted, again.

17 February 2008

• 08:4508:45, 17 February 2008 diff hist +76,245‎ User talk:The Evil Spartan ‎ rvv
• 01:2501:25, 17 February 2008 diff hist +3‎ Azumanga Daioh ‎ rvv last of vandalism
• 01:2401:24, 17 February 2008 diff hist +113‎ Azumanga Daioh ‎ rvv

15 February 2008

• 00:1700:17, 15 February 2008 diff hist −313‎ Eve Online ‎ rvv, unsourced speculation

14 February 2008

• 02:0302:03, 14 February 2008 diff hist +52‎ Battletoads ‎ Undid revision 191284430 by 65.191.26.160 (talk)

12 February 2008

• 18:0818:08, 12 February 2008 diff hist −356‎ Battletoads ‎ Undid revision 190922620 by 198.203.175.175 (talk)
• 08:3608:36, 12 February 2008 diff hist +565‎ User talk:Dark Shikari ‎ →‎Combined Comunity Codec Pack / AVG
• 00:1500:15, 12 February 2008 diff hist +561‎ User talk:Dark Shikari ‎ →‎Combined Comunity Codec Pack / AVG

11 February 2008

• 19:5819:58, 11 February 2008 diff hist −295‎ Combined Community Codec Pack ‎ Again, AVG is reporting a false positive. Please do not include unsourced defamatory statements in articles.
• 03:0503:05, 11 February 2008 diff hist −21‎ Marian Wright Edelman ‎ fix error in formatting

10 February 2008

• 23:2323:23, 10 February 2008 diff hist −333‎ Talk:Battletoads ‎ rvv 4chna trolling
• 23:1323:13, 10 February 2008 diff hist −295‎ Combined Community Codec Pack ‎ AVG has a tendency to report false positives. Removed for lack of sources.
• 20:5120:51, 10 February 2008 diff hist 0‎ Steel ‎ Undid revision 190449872 by 70.174.76.173 (talk)
• 09:3909:39, 10 February 2008 diff hist −312‎ Eve Online ‎ The job of Wikipedia isn't to report to the truth; its purpose is to report what is attributable and verifiable.
• 07:3807:38, 10 February 2008 diff hist +514‎ Talk:Eve Online ‎ →‎Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate

8 February 2008

• 03:4603:46, 8 February 2008 diff hist −312‎ Eve Online ‎ "There are no reliable sources, therefore this forum is a reliable source for these allegations" is not a valid argument.

7 February 2008

• 02:5702:57, 7 February 2008 diff hist −15‎ Battletoads ‎ Undid revision 189653643 by Eleven Special (talk)

6 February 2008

• 17:3117:31, 6 February 2008 diff hist −232‎ Eve Online ‎ Reverted--cruiser skill does not and has never required destroyer skill (it requires racial Frigate level 4 only).
• 17:0717:07, 6 February 2008 diff hist +388‎ Talk:Eve Online ‎ →‎Why a source within the EVE Aurora forums in not appropriate
• 17:0517:05, 6 February 2008 diff hist −281‎ Eve Online ‎ Again, such extreme allegations cannot be verified with a source on a private forum. Find an acceptable source, or remove the allegations.

3 February 2008

• 01:1801:18, 3 February 2008 diff hist −947‎ Eve Online ‎ Again, forums are not valid references for these sort of allegations. Its much the same logic as BLP; allegations such as these require solid references.

2 February 2008

• 06:0106:01, 2 February 2008 diff hist −443‎ Eve Online ‎ It doesn't matter *who* said it--a statement on a private forum is not a reliable source for such an allegation.

28 January 2008

• 22:4722:47, 28 January 2008 diff hist −33‎ Battletoads ‎ Undid revision 187562398 by 90.202.16.229 (talk)

27 January 2008

• 09:0109:01, 27 January 2008 diff hist −44‎ Battletoads ‎ Undid revision 187205459 by 71.223.149.125 (talk)

21 January 2008

• 09:5009:50, 21 January 2008 diff hist −1,204‎ Eve Online ‎ If they look kosher to you, why not explain why on the talk page instead of blanket reverting the existing consensus?

20 January 2008

• 06:3806:38, 20 January 2008 diff hist +354‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:Toxicmango
• 06:3606:36, 20 January 2008 diff hist +422‎ User talk:Toxicmango ‎ →‎3RR: new section
• 06:3406:34, 20 January 2008 diff hist +476‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:Toxicmango at EVE Online: formatting
• 06:3206:32, 20 January 2008 diff hist +1,133‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎Violations
• 05:5405:54, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204‎ Eve Online ‎ Again, there is consensus against you on the talk page. If you disagree, discuss it, don't blanket revert.
• 05:0905:09, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204‎ Eve Online ‎ You will keep being reverted until you discuss on the talk page. This is not optional.
• 01:4401:44, 20 January 2008 diff hist +1‎ m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:Toxicmango
• 01:4001:40, 20 January 2008 diff hist +858‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ‎ →‎User:Toxicmango: new section
• 01:3701:37, 20 January 2008 diff hist −1,204‎ Eve Online ‎ Discuss on the talk page. The way to deal with an objection is not to revert it without answering their complaint.

17 January 2008

• 23:2023:20, 17 January 2008 diff hist −52‎ Eve Online ‎ Saying something is "disputed" without giving a valid source is weasel wording. Its much like saying "Some people think that..."

14 January 2008

• 02:2102:21, 14 January 2008 diff hist −510‎ Eve Online ‎ The source you have cited does NOT do anything except state the allegations; it does not state that the allegations were true. If you want to debate this, take it to the talk page.

13 January 2008

• 05:3605:36, 13 January 2008 diff hist +353‎ User talk:Dark Shikari ‎ →‎EVE Online

12 January 2008

• 22:0622:06, 12 January 2008 diff hist +536‎ User talk:Dark Shikari ‎ →‎EVE Online
• 22:0522:05, 12 January 2008 diff hist +396‎ User talk:Dark Shikari ‎ →‎EVE Online
• 21:0321:03, 12 January 2008 diff hist +627‎ User talk:Toxicmango ‎ →‎Vandalism at EVE Online: new section
• 20:5920:59, 12 January 2008 diff hist −510‎ Eve Online ‎ rvv vandalism