User contributions for ChadHansen
6 October 2018
- 23:2623:26, 6 October 2018 diff hist −22 When a white horse is not a horse Hansen, Chad. (1983). (see above). There are no articles in Chinese, so the nouns must be read as collectives, mass nouns or plurals. The argument is about the use of terms hence belongs to the school of names. It is not about the color of horses.
11 October 2008
- 15:2415:24, 11 October 2008 diff hist +52 Chinese philosophy Include more points of view of the origin of classical thought.
9 October 2008
- 22:1122:11, 9 October 2008 diff hist +114 Taoism →Categorization: complete quote for precision
6 October 2008
- 18:1018:10, 6 October 2008 diff hist +34 Chinese philosophy →Taoism: I don't recognize this from anywhere in either text?? Is there a reference? and a justification of the claim that it is the "main" focus?
- 18:0718:07, 6 October 2008 diff hist +1,763 Chinese philosophy →Taoism: preserved most content, add detail, clarity and precision
- 17:2517:25, 6 October 2008 diff hist +55 Talk:Taoism →Merge from Taoist doctrine
- 17:2317:23, 6 October 2008 diff hist +480 Talk:Taoism →Posted for delisting on Good Article Review: endorse motion to remove it from the list of good articles--severely biased.
- 17:1917:19, 6 October 2008 diff hist +2,144 Talk:Taoism →Daojia vs. Daojiao: disagree with imperious removal of all the philosophically careful readings of Daoist texts.
- 17:0117:01, 6 October 2008 diff hist +826 Talk:Taoism →Redirect to Daoism: agree
- 06:3006:30, 6 October 2008 diff hist −80 Taoism Undid revision 243323260 by Vassyana (talk)no we don't--we need to represent a range of responsible views
- 00:3400:34, 6 October 2008 diff hist −139 Taoism →Categorization: argumentum ad populum
5 October 2008
- 22:5122:51, 5 October 2008 diff hist +59 Taoism Undid revision 243242759 by Vassyana (talk)Kohn draws two distinctions. This article is biased to religious taoism.
- 04:5104:51, 5 October 2008 diff hist +59 m Taoism →Categorization
2 October 2008
- 15:0115:01, 2 October 2008 diff hist −4 m Taoism →Principles: grammar
- 14:5814:58, 2 October 2008 diff hist −1,135 Taoism →Grasping the Concept: No argument or evidence for the claims made about Daoism. How does writer know the first premise--unless he grasps the way?
- 03:5303:53, 2 October 2008 diff hist +284 Taoism →Wu wei: Textual detail and explanation of theory of wu-wei
- 03:4203:42, 2 October 2008 diff hist +363 Taoism →Wu wei: citation and text detail
1 October 2008
- 16:3916:39, 1 October 2008 diff hist +17 Taoism →Beliefs: improve punctuation and add characters
- 09:0409:04, 1 October 2008 diff hist +4 m Taoism →Beliefs: grammar
- 09:0309:03, 1 October 2008 diff hist +15 Taoism →Beliefs: add characters for key concepts
- 09:0109:01, 1 October 2008 diff hist −4 m Taoism →Beliefs: grammar change
- 08:3308:33, 1 October 2008 diff hist +2,385 Taoism →Wu wei: Add textual evidence and detail. Mark interpretive claims explicitly.
- 06:3206:32, 1 October 2008 diff hist +13 Taoism →Tao: Separate reprise of categorization discussion from theories about the concept of tao.
- 06:2706:27, 1 October 2008 diff hist +24 Taoism →Categorization: revise question-begging statement of Robinet's view (real Taoists (??) disagree with "non-Taoist Historians? Who gets to declare whom a Taoist nowadays?
- 06:1806:18, 1 October 2008 diff hist +33 Taoism →Tao: this is repetitive from the above and should be deleted to referred back up
- 06:1506:15, 1 October 2008 diff hist +11 Taoism →Beliefs: Add alternate romanization and Chinese character
- 06:1106:11, 1 October 2008 diff hist +1 Taoism →Beliefs: spacing
- 06:1006:10, 1 October 2008 diff hist +268 Taoism →References: Add Angus Graham, Mair and Wing Tsit Chan
- 05:2305:23, 1 October 2008 diff hist +557 Taoism →Categorization: describing philosophical issues in textual theory and interpretation. And identifying a wider range of theories about them.
- 05:0105:01, 1 October 2008 diff hist −17 Taoism →Categorization: grammatical agreement
- 04:5404:54, 1 October 2008 diff hist +187 Taoism →Principles: further crediting interpretations to interpreters--removing vague "authoritative" passives and clarification
- 04:4804:48, 1 October 2008 diff hist 0 m Taoism →Principles: syntax
- 04:4704:47, 1 October 2008 diff hist +825 Taoism →Tao: personal interpretive opinions should be represented as such, not as facts, and the range of views should be treated neutrally in Wikipedia. It should not exclude philosophical scholars.
- 04:3304:33, 1 October 2008 diff hist −9 Taoism →Categorization: we don't need to presuppose that disagreement in interpretation is a "difficulty"--it is the standard state of dispute at the cutting edge of any discipline
- 03:4603:46, 1 October 2008 diff hist +19 Taoism →Categorization
- 03:2603:26, 1 October 2008 diff hist +738 Taoism →Beliefs: Added the issue of philosophical beliefs.
- 03:0703:07, 1 October 2008 diff hist +287 Taoism →Categorization: removed implicit appeals to authority of consensus, clarified a translation point confused as a substantive one, added discussion of philosophical to religious classification.
- 02:5302:53, 1 October 2008 diff hist +1,702 Taoism →Beliefs: removed ad homenim attacks and appeals to alleged consensus (most scholars, those who have not studied Daoism, etc.). Distinguished religious from natural guide interpretations.
15 April 2007
- 23:0623:06, 15 April 2007 diff hist +4 Tao No edit summary
- 23:0623:06, 15 April 2007 diff hist +733 Tao No edit summary
11 September 2006
- 03:2903:29, 11 September 2006 diff hist +20 Tao No edit summary
- 03:2703:27, 11 September 2006 diff hist +1 Tao No edit summary
- 03:2703:27, 11 September 2006 diff hist +8 Tao No edit summary
- 03:2503:25, 11 September 2006 diff hist +873 Tao No edit summary
28 August 2006
- 22:3922:39, 28 August 2006 diff hist +459 Zhuang Zhou →The beliefs
