User contributions for 49.180.226.13
11 March 2021
- 01:0201:02, 11 March 2021 diff hist +1,467 User talk:49.180.226.13 →Welcome!: Thanks.. I would make an account but feel I am wasting my time. Until western media talks about the info in the morningstar article, I am limited in being able to add real info but I think wikipedia needs to not be biased towards sources like morningstar and judge more on factuality rather than political orientation - adrian's books on google book view confirms his homophobic views and calling gender equality as satanism quite literally yet all that is swept under the rug :( , etc current
10 March 2021
- 12:0212:02, 10 March 2021 diff hist +19 Wu Lien-teh →Death and commemoration
- 12:0012:00, 10 March 2021 diff hist +23 Wu Lien-teh →Death and commemoration: add link Tag: Visual edit
- 11:5911:59, 10 March 2021 diff hist +36 Wu Lien-teh →Death and commemoration: thought it's pretty relevant to point out the obvious historic contect for the future readers of wiki
- 07:1407:14, 10 March 2021 diff hist +8 Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China →I think it should be cultural genocide
- 07:1207:12, 10 March 2021 diff hist +36 Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China →I think it should be cultural genocide
- 07:0907:09, 10 March 2021 diff hist +432 Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China →I think it should be cultural genocide
- 07:0307:03, 10 March 2021 diff hist +787 Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China →I think it should be cultural genocide: Calling it as genocide without any evidence is no different to repeating the same western mistakes reporting genocide in Libya. Lack of evidence but plenty of claiming out of place political bias https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181025-how-the-world-was-misled-into-the-libyan-war/amp/ Us state lawyers acknowledged lack of evidence to claim genocide and Adrian zenz report is far from solid. So it should be alleged genocide given current stages. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 06:5306:53, 10 March 2021 diff hist +907 Talk:Persecution of Uyghurs in China →Adrian Zenz as a source - really?: Adrian zenz should have his background be mentioned so people can know who he is And not just be presented as an expert not to be questioned with. As his evidence is questionable And his background is a homophobic rapture ready right wing influencer. https://sizeof.cat/post/adrian-zenz-jamestown-foundation-manipulate-free-press/ Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
|