User contributions for 37.209.42.230

17 August 2015

• 11:5611:56, 17 August 2015 diff hist +317‎ Talk:Dependency grammar ‎ →‎Identity of Phrase structure (at least some) and dependency grammar? (Asking more out of interest than anything else)

13 August 2015

• 14:1614:16, 13 August 2015 diff hist +128‎ Talk:Phrase structure grammar ‎ →‎I made a comment relating to this page (indirectly) here: fixed link (sorry, hadn
• 14:1414:14, 13 August 2015 diff hist +257‎ Talk:Phrase structure grammar ‎ →‎I made a comment relating to this page (indirectly) here: new section
• 14:1214:12, 13 August 2015 diff hist +813‎ Talk:Dependency grammar ‎ →‎Identity of Phrase structure (at least some) and dependency grammar? (Asking more out of interest than anything else): new section

7 August 2015

• 17:0917:09, 7 August 2015 diff hist +1,129‎ Template talk:Linguistic typology topics ‎ →‎Any intentionality in the order of subjects?: new section
• 15:1715:17, 7 August 2015 diff hist +392‎ Talk:Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod ‎ →‎Import some of the critical reception from german article: new section
• 15:0015:00, 7 August 2015 diff hist +49‎ Talk:English usage controversies ‎ →‎Erm... questionable (that is "fragwürdiger" :P) article
• 14:5314:53, 7 August 2015 diff hist +11‎ Talk:List of English words with disputed usage ‎ →‎Two points - archive and framing
• 14:5214:52, 7 August 2015 diff hist +140‎ Talk:List of English words with disputed usage ‎ →‎Two points - archive and framing
• 14:4914:49, 7 August 2015 diff hist +1‎ Talk:List of English words with disputed usage ‎ →‎Two points - archive and framing
• 14:4814:48, 7 August 2015 diff hist +915‎ Talk:List of English words with disputed usage ‎ →‎Two points - archive and framing: new section
• 14:3414:34, 7 August 2015 diff hist +761‎ Talk:English usage controversies ‎ →‎Erm... questionable (that is "fragwürdiger" :P) article: new section
• 14:2314:23, 7 August 2015 diff hist +673‎ Talk:Common English usage misconceptions ‎ →‎Disputes in English grammar: comment
• 12:5712:57, 7 August 2015 diff hist +10‎ Morphosyntactic alignment ‎ Two of the seven are not shown in image - name both
• 12:2312:23, 7 August 2015 diff hist +501‎ Talk:Nominative case ‎ →‎Needs some love: new section
• 08:4708:47, 7 August 2015 diff hist −169‎ Word-sense disambiguation ‎ oops - last edit was removal of a advertising link (thats what it looked like to me). This one is removal of a sentence that seems pretty far out, and is not attributed (was called out for that by someone else previously)
• 08:4308:43, 7 August 2015 diff hist −157‎ Word-sense disambiguation ‎ 2 edits

5 August 2015

• 17:2017:20, 5 August 2015 diff hist +106‎ Predicate (grammar) ‎ reverted deletions (last two edits)

30 July 2015

• 19:2519:25, 30 July 2015 diff hist +314‎ Talk:Shakespeare attribution studies ‎ →‎Empty sections ?: new section
• 17:1117:11, 30 July 2015 diff hist +800‎ Talk:Shakespeare authorship question ‎ →‎Balance ?

29 July 2015

• 11:1911:19, 29 July 2015 diff hist −564‎ Theoretical linguistics ‎ →‎See also: Cut out long rambling and non-coherent explanation of pragmatics. Though trying to say some correct tghings, don't know what its doing here.... left a link to pragmatics though

29 June 2015

• 17:3517:35, 29 June 2015 diff hist −1,164‎ Central dogma of molecular biology ‎ →‎Use of the term "dogma": removed section "emerging ideas" - for reasoning, see talk page (was ok what it said - but not correctly put into context of the central dogma) Tag: section blanking
• 17:3317:33, 29 June 2015 diff hist +614‎ Talk:Central dogma of molecular biology ‎ →‎Removing the final section "Emerging ideas": new section

10 June 2015

• 16:2216:22, 10 June 2015 diff hist +97‎ Talk:Shakespeare authorship question ‎ →‎Balance ?: another link
• 16:1816:18, 10 June 2015 diff hist +403‎ Talk:Shakespeare authorship question ‎ →‎Balance ?: new section

26 February 2015

• 22:2922:29, 26 February 2015 diff hist −106‎ Neurospora crassa ‎ →‎External links: Removed link - the page linked to has less information than here, but with adverts and the request to donate... probably need to keep an eye out that it is not readded here...

5 November 2014

• 16:4616:46, 5 November 2014 diff hist −1‎ Pyrenoid ‎ must have been mistyped ... only makes sense like this

3 November 2014

• 20:2820:28, 3 November 2014 diff hist −582‎ Abiogenesis ‎ →‎Current models: I'm afraid what venter et al are doing is something completely different... I don't know what a "top-down" approach is supposed to look like, but I'll leave it stand for now.