SDES

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (October 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "SDES" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

SDES (Session Description Protocol Security Descriptions) for Media Streams is a way to negotiate the key for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol. It has been proposed for standardization to the IETF in July 2006 (see RFC 4568.)

How it works

The keys are transported in the SDP attachment of a SIP message. That means, the SIP transport layer must make sure that no one else can see the attachment. This can be done by using TLS transport layer, or other methods like S/MIME. Using TLS assumes that the next hop in the SIP proxy chain can be trusted and it will take care about the security requirements of the request.

The main advantage of this method is that it is extremely simple. The key exchange method has been picked up by several vendors already, even though some vendors do not use a secure mechanism to transport the key. This helps to get the critical mass of implementation to make this method the de facto standard.

To illustrate this principle with an example, the phone sends a call to the proxy. By using the sips scheme, it indicates that the call must be made secure. The key is base-64 encoded in the SDP attachment.

INVITE sips:*97@ietf.org;user=phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 172.20.25.100:2049;branch=z9hG4bK-s5kcqq8jqjv3;rport
From: "123" <sips:123@ietf.org>;tag=mogkxsrhm4
To: <sips:*97@ietf.org;user=phone>
Call-ID: 3c269247a122-f0ee6wcrvkcq@snom360-000413230A07
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:123@172.20.25.100:2049;transport=tls;line=gyhiepdm>;reg-id=1
User-Agent: snom360/6.2.2
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO
Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer
Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces, callerid
Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uas
Min-SE: 90
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 477

v=0
o=root 2071608643 2071608643 IN IP4 172.20.25.100
s=call
c=IN IP4 172.20.25.100
t=0 0
m=audio 57676 RTP/SAVP 0 8 9 2 3 18 4 101
a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:WbTBosdVUZqEb6Htqhn+m3z7wUh4RJVR8nE15GbN
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000
a=rtpmap:9 g722/8000
a=rtpmap:2 g726-32/8000
a=rtpmap:3 gsm/8000
a=rtpmap:18 g729/8000
a=rtpmap:4 g723/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=ptime:20
a=encryption:optional
a=sendrecv

The phone receives the answer from the proxy and now there can be a two-way secure call:

SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 172.20.25.100:2049;branch=z9hG4bK-s5kcqq8jqjv3;rport=62401;received=66.31.106.96
From: "123" <sips:123@ietf.org>;tag=mogkxsrhm4
To: <sips:*97@ietf.org;user=phone>;tag=237592673
Call-ID: 3c269247a122-f0ee6wcrvkcq@snom360-000413230A07
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:*97@203.43.12.32:5061;transport=tls>
Supported: 100rel, replaces
Allow-Events: refer
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, PRACK, INFO
Accept: application/sdp
User-Agent: pbxnsip-PBX/1.5.1
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 298

v=0
o=- 1996782469 1996782469 IN IP4 203.43.12.32
s=-
c=IN IP4 203.43.12.32
t=0 0
m=audio 57076 RTP/SAVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-11
a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:bmt4MzIzMmYxdnFyaWM3d282dGR5Z3g0c2k5M3Yx
a=ptime:20
a=sendrecv

Discussion: Call Initiation and missing End-to-End Encryption

A common problem with secure media is that the key exchange might not be finished when the first media packet arrives. In order to avoid initial clicks, those packets must be dropped. Usually this is only a short period of time (below 100 ms), so that this is no major problem.

The SDES method does not address the "end-to-end" media encryption. For example, if user A is talking to user B via a proxy P, SDES allows negotiation of keys between A and P or between B and P, but not between A and B. For end-to-end media security you must first establish a trust relationship with the other side. If you use a trusted intermediate for this, the call setup delay will significantly increase, which makes applications like push-to-talk difficult. If you do this peer-to-peer, it might be difficult for you to identify the other side. For example, your operator might implement a B2BUA architecture and play the role of the other side, so that you still don't have end-to-end security. Newer, modern protocols, like ZRTP, offer end-to-end encryption for SIP/RTP calls.

See also

• MIKEY key exchange method
• ZRTP end-to-end key exchange proposal
• DTLS-SRTP end-to-end key exchange IETF standard

External links

• Presentation about different key exchange methods (Microsoft PowerPoint format.)