Puerto Rican citizenship and nationality

Puerto Rico is an island in the Caribbean region in which inhabitants were Spanish nationals from 1508 until the Spanish–American War in 1898, from which point they derived their nationality from United States law. Nationality is the legal means by which inhabitants acquire formal membership in a nation without regard to its governance type.[1] In addition to being United States nationals, persons are citizens of the United States and citizens of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico within the context of United States Citizenship. Miriam J. Ramirez de Ferrer v. Juan Mari Brás (144 DPR 141, 1997). Citizenship, the rights and obligations that each owes the other, once one has become a member of a nation.[2] Though the Constitution of the United States recognizes both national and state citizenship as a means of accessing rights,[3][note 1] Puerto Rico's history as a territory has created both confusion over the status of its nationals and citizens and controversy because of distinctions between jurisdictions of the United States.[9][10] These differences have created[9] what political scientist Charles R. Venator-Santiago has called "separate and unequal" statuses.[10]

History of nationality in Puerto Rico

Spanish period (1508–1898)

Constitution of Cádiz

Puerto Rico was a Spanish colony for four hundred years, after Spain first established a settlement on the island in 1508.[11][12] In accordance with the Laws of the Indies, criollos, persons born in the colonies, had fewer rights than peninsulares, those born in Spain.[13] After a governmental reorganization and propagation of the first Spanish constitution, the 1812 Constitution of Cádiz, Puerto Ricans were defined as persons born on the island and their descendants.[14][15] They were granted an equal status and representation in the Spanish Parliament. Within two years, the constitution was suspended and absolute monarchy returned, along with the former unequal status based upon place of birth.[14] A Royal Charter issued in 1816, invited foreigners to migrate to Puerto Rico to engage in professions and offered them an opportunity to become Spanish citizens, upon request after establishing residency for five years.[16] Foreigners who established a permanent residence in Puerto Rico were considered subjects, neither Spanish-nationals nor native-born, unless they chose to naturalize.[17] The children born in Puerto Rico derived the status of their fathers. If the father naturalized as Spanish, the children were Spanish nationals and if the father retained his foreign nationality, the children were foreign nationals.[16]

Instability in the Spanish Empire resulted in a lengthy period where the Constitution of Cádiz was reinstated and revoked several times, leaving Puerto Rico without specific legal status for its inhabitants until 1873, when the Spanish Constitution of 1869 was extended to the island.[18] This constitution abolished slavery in Puerto Rico and established a bill of rights for inhabitants. It was short-lived and ceased to be effective in 1874, with the restoration of the monarchy.[19] The 1812 Constitution contained provisions for Spain to draft a Civil Code. Numerous attempts were unsuccessful, until a code was finally adopted in 1889. By royal decree on July 31, the Spanish Civil Code was extended to Cuba, the Philippines and Puerto Rico, coming into effect on January 1, 1890.[20] The provisions of the code, in Article 22, required a married woman to derive her nationality from her husband.[17]

United States period (1898–present)

Establishing nationality for Puerto Rico (1898–1952)

At the conclusion of the Spanish–American War, under terms of the 1898 Treaty of Paris, the United States acquired control over Cuba, Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.[21] Prior to signature of the treaty, all persons born in US possessions had been collectively naturalized by the United States. Under the terms of the 1898 Treaty, however, possessions were deemed to be foreign localities and because no collective naturalization was provided, persons living therein were not protected by the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[22] The language created a new classification of non-citizen US nationals, which applied at the time to Cuba, Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico, and was later extended to include American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. In essence, until Congress chose to convey rights of citizenship, inhabitants of possessions were not extended full constitutional rights, but belonged to the United States.[23]

The lack of a collective naturalization clause created a situation which treated inhabitants differently based upon their origin. Spanish nationals born in Spain could opt to remain Spanish, by making a formal declaration within one year of the treaty in a court that they wished to retain their original nationality. Failure to do so, severed the tie to Spain if the person remained in Puerto Rico. Foreigners remained foreign nationals. Persons born in Puerto Rico automatically became US nationals, but according to scholar John L. A. de Passalacqua, had no "citizenship whatsoever recognized under international law or even United States municipal law".[24] In 1900, the US Congress passed the first Organic Act, known as the Foraker Act, to regulate the status of Puerto Rico and establish a civilian government.[25] It created a legislature, over which the US Congress retained authority to annul laws[26] and established that while Puerto Ricans were US nationals, they were territorial citizens.[27] US nationality applied only to those who had renounced Spanish nationality or were already US nationals residing in Puerto Rico. It did not extend to foreigners or those born in Puerto Rico who were residing abroad.[25] The Puerto Rican Civil Code, as did other laws in force at the time, remained applicable in accordance with terms of the Foraker Act.[28] It was replaced in 1902, incorporating portions of the Louisiana Code.[20]

The Civil Code was revised again in 1930, with only slight modifications from the former version and contained provisions for the legal incapacitation of married women until revision in 1976.[20][29] In 1934, amendments to the Cable Act, which partially provided married women individual nationality, were incorporated into the Equal Nationality Act.[30][31] Women were allowed under the amendment for their children born abroad to derive their nationality.[30] The 1934 Nationality Act also provided that Puerto Rican women who had been denationalized because of marriage prior to March 2, 1917, the date upon which Puerto Ricans were extended US statutory citizenship, had the option to repatriate.[32][33] Amendments to the Jones Act, that same year, established that US collective naturalization was extended to all Puerto Ricans born after April 11, 1899, and thereafter naturalization was acquired at birth.[34][35] Minor changes were made to the Jones Act in 1940 extending US nationality to foreigners who had permanent residency in Puerto Rico.[36] That year the Nationality Act of 1940 codified into a single federal statute, various laws and decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States on nationality, including the status of non-citizen national, clarifying that not all persons with allegiance to the United States were able to acquire the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.[37] It also established the principle that after 1941, all Puerto Ricans acquired US nationality at birth, in a similar manner to other US nationals, no longer through naturalization.[38]

In 1942, a proposed amendment of 1940 Act passed the US House to address the provision with regard to Puerto Ricans for loss of nationality of naturalized persons.[35][39] Initially, US nationality had not been a birthright for islanders and under the Jones Act they were collectively naturalized. A provision of the 1940 Act denationalized naturalized persons after five years continuous residency abroad, but had no restriction on the length of foreign residence for birthright nationals. To address this discrepancy, the amendment proposed to exclude Puerto Ricans from loss of nationality because of residence abroad.[40] It was referred to committee in the Senate and had no further action.[39] The measure was reintroduced in 1943 and 1946, and was finally successful in exempting Puerto Ricans from denationalization in 1948.[41] The US Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, codified under Title 8 of the United States Code, revised the wording concerning Puerto Ricans, granting nationality to persons born in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899, and prior to January 13, 1941, who had not been covered in previous legislation, and thereafter to Puerto Ricans at birth. It did not address the status of persons born prior to April 11, 1899.[42]

Establishing citizenship for Puerto Rico (1900–1952)

In 1900, the territorial legislature passed the Political Code of Puerto Rico, which recognized as Puerto Rican citizens, US nationals permanently living on the island, and former Spanish nationals who had severed ties with Spain, in language identical to the Foraker Act. However, it also contained the primary provision in Title II, Section 10, that anyone born in Puerto Rico "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was a Puerto Rican citizen.[43][44] The US Supreme Court ruled in the Insular Cases (1901–1922), that for unincorporated territories and insular possessions of the United States, which were not on a path toward statehood, the US Constitution did not necessarily apply.[45][46] Specifically, in Downes v. Bidwell (182 U.S. 244, 1901) the Supreme Court found that though Puerto Rico belonged to the United States, it was not part of it constitutionally because it was "inhabited by alien races, differing from us in religion, customs, laws, methods of taxation and modes of thought and therefore the administration of government and justice, according to Anglo-Saxon principles, may for a time be impossible".[45] In Gonzales v. Williams (192 U.S. 1, 1904) the Supreme Court affirmed that Puerto Ricans were not aliens, or immigrants, causing Congress to pass in 1906, special provisions for persons born in unincorporated territories to naturalize in the United States.[45][47]

In 1917, the Jones–Shafroth Act established statutory, rather than constitutional, US citizenship, upon US nationals of Puerto Rico and those who might have been absent from the territory at the time of US acquisition, but who had now returned to the island.[45][48] People who had renounced foreign nationality and were previously Puerto Rican under local law, became stateless under the terms of the Jones Act.[36] In 1922, the US Supreme Court clarified in the case of Balzac v. Porto Rico (258 US 298, 1922) that the full protection and rights of the US Constitution are not applicable to residents of Puerto Rico until they come to reside in the United States proper.[49] Amendments to the Jones Act in 1927 extended naturalization with statutory citizenship to those who had been absent when it was enacted and those whom it had rendered stateless because of residency under previous Spanish law.[36]

In 1950, the US Congress passed Public Law 600, authorizing Puerto Rico to draft its own constitution to regulate its internal affairs.[50] A local referendum was held to determine whether the government should be organized with a commonwealth status. The Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico established a constitution which had few differences between the relationship of Puerto Rico and the United States. Parts of the Jones Act were repealed, but the remainder ensured that the permanent association with the United States remained.[51]

Current system

Nationality acquisition and federal citizenship

By virtue of the various laws passed concerning Puerto Rican nationality and citizenship, Puerto Ricans acquire nationality and federal citizenship by various means. These include by birth in one of the fifty states or District of Columbia; becoming naturalized; under the terms of the Jones Act, as it has been amended over time; under provisions of the Nationality Act of 1940 and by having a parent who was Puerto Rican and held federal nationality; or birth in Puerto Rico on or after April 11, 1899.[52] Likewise, federal statutory citizenship has been acquired through the Jones Act and its various amendments through time.[53] Despite possessing federal statutory citizenship, residents of Puerto Rico have no representation in the US Congress, are unable to vote in the Electoral College, and do not have full protection under the US Constitution, until they come to reside in a U.S. state.[54] Though all residents of Puerto Rico pay some federal taxes,[55][56] there is less federal assistance available to island citizens through programs like Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, and Supplemental Security Income.[57] Puerto Rico's history as a territory has created both confusion over the status of its nationals and citizenship and controversy because of distinctions between jurisdictions of the United States.[9][10] These differences have created[9] what political scientist Charles R. Venator-Santiago has called "separate and unequal" statuses,[10] and in an ambiguous liminal status.[58]

Relinquishing United States nationality

United States citizens are allowed to give up their nationality and citizenship if the act is voluntary and intentional.[59] Over time, 287 residents of Puerto Rico have formally renounced their nationality.[60] Since 1990, the US State Department presumes no intention to give up nationality, even when a person has performed a potentially expatriating act.[61] Renunciation requires making a formal declaration, which is sworn before a designated authority in the United States during a time of war, or abroad at any time to a consular officer; attending an interview and counseling session; payment of a fee; and signing requisite documents.[62]

In 1994, Juan Mari Brás flew to Venezuela and renounced his US nationality, in an attempt to rid himself from what he saw as the colonialism inherent in Puerto Ricans being considered U.S. nationals.[63] [64] In 1995, he was issued a Certificate of Loss of Nationality by the State Department.[63] In 1996, the Secretary of Justice issued clarification on the matter to the Governor of Puerto Rico confirming that nationality in a sovereign state is not the same as state or territorial citizenship. Further, because Puerto Rico falls under the sovereignty of the United States, renunciation of his nationality left him stateless and it would require a decision of the US Immigration and Naturalization Service, as to whether he could obtain a visa to remain in Puerto Rico after renunciation.[65] In the US District Court for the District of Columbia a decision in Davis v. District Director (481 F. Supp. 1178, D.D.C., 1979) determined that renunciation of US nationality rendered the person an alien without right to remain in the country without a valid visa.[66] The same district court upheld similar findings in Colón v. U.S. Department of State (2 F. Supp. 2d 43, D.D.C., 1998), ruling that US nationality cannot be renounced if it is the intent of a petitioner to reside in Puerto Rico and allege that they can do so because they have Puerto Rican citizenship.[67][68] Shortly thereafter, because Mari Brás wished to remain in Puerto Rico, the State Department reversed its decision to accept his renunciation.[69]

Domestic citizenship

Puerto Rican suffragists Isabel Andreu de Aguilar (left) and Milagros Benet de Mewton (right)

Since 1900, with the establishment of the territorial legislature under the terms of the Foraker Act, and development of the Political Code of Puerto Rico, domestic citizenship has been recognized[44] and was later recognized in the Constitution of Puerto Rico.[70][71] When women gained the right to vote in the United States in 1919, the Bureau of Insular Affairs confirmed that their new constitutional right did not extend to unincorporated territories.[72] The US Supreme Court confirmed in the Insular Cases that extension of the franchise was bound by the terms in the Foraker Act.[73] Puerto Rican suffragists and their supporters, led by women such as Isabel Andreu de Aguilar, Rosario Bellber, and Milagros Benet de Mewton, among others, introduced women's suffrage legislation in 1919, 1921, 1923, and 1927 without success.[74][75] De Mewton sued the Electoral Board in 1924 for refusing to allow her to register, but the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico ruled against her on the grounds that the legislature had the authority to determine who were eligible voters in the island.[76][77] Appealing to the United States legislature, suffragists pressed for federal legislation for the right to vote. When the US House introduced legislation in 1928, the Puerto Rican legislature agreed to review the issue. They passed a bill in 1929 to extend the franchise to women, limited to those who were literate.[78] Universal suffrage was finally granted in Puerto Rico in 1936.[79]

The constitution adopted in 1952 provided citizens of the Commonwealth with a bill of rights consistent with the US Constitution.[70] Acts of the Puerto Rican government must conform to federal requirements, but they are able to exercise self-governance in a manner similar to all states in the federal system.[80] In 1997, during his quest to divest himself of US nationality, Mari Brás attempted to redefine Puerto Rican citizenship and have it recognized as nationality.[81] In the case of Miriam J. Ramirez de Ferrer v. Juan Mari Brás (144 DPR 141, 1997) the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico reaffirmed that Puerto Rican citizenship existed, but that it existed in the context of a US nationality. The ruling confirmed that citizenship in the island was dependent on both US citizenship and residency in Puerto Rico.[82][81] The day prior to the ruling, Puerto Rico's Political Code had been amended with similar language.[83] Since the summer of 2007, the Puerto Rico State Department has developed a protocol to grant Puerto Rican citizenship certificates to Puerto Ricans.[84] Certificates of Puerto Rican citizenship are issued on request by the Puerto Rico State Department to confirm a person's citizenship status in Puerto Rico to any persons born on the island and subject to its jurisdiction, as well as to those born outside of the island that have at least one parent who was born on the island.[85]

Dual nationality

The official policy of the United States Government allows dual nationality and recognizes that it exists. The US government does not officially endorse a policy for multiple nationalities of its nationals.[86] On October 25, 2006, Mari Brás became the first person to receive a Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship from the Puerto Rico Department of State.[87] The Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship can be used to obtain dual nationality in Spain, as it is considered proof of Ibero-American heritage.[88] Under the Spanish statutes known as Organic Law 4/2000 and Royal Decree 557/2011, persons who have historic ties to Spain and can demonstrate their origin in an Ibero-American country can be naturalized without renouncing their previous nationality.[89]

  • Application form for the Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship
    Application form for the
    Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship
  • Reverse side of the application form for the Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship
    Reverse side of the application form for the
    Certificate of Puerto Rican Citizenship

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The Constitution of the United States establishes that rights flow from both national and state citizenship,[3] as does the Jones Act for Puerto Ricans.[4] Because federal law, including treaties, overrides other laws within its territorial limits only if those laws are incompatible with national statutes,[5][6] states historically have been able to grant or withhold rights for various categories of persons residing in their jurisdiction without abridging the Equal Protection Clause.[7] Until the 1960s, differences in legislation among various jurisdictions gave people extremely different civil rights depending upon where they resided.[8]

References

Citations

  1. ^ Villazor 2017, pp. 1707–1708.
  2. ^ Kerber 1997, p. 834.
  3. ^ a b Bickel 1973, p. 369.
  4. ^ Hein 2009, pp. 449–450.
  5. ^ Lapidus 1980, p. 252.
  6. ^ Vázquez 2008, pp. 622–625.
  7. ^ Ginsburg 1979, p. 162.
  8. ^ Carlson 2007, p. 262.
  9. ^ a b c d Hein 2009, pp. 426–427.
  10. ^ a b c d Venator-Santiago 2013, p. 16.
  11. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, p. 139.
  12. ^ Trías Monge 1997, p. vii.
  13. ^ Trías Monge 1997, pp. 8, 20.
  14. ^ a b Trías Monge 1997, p. 9.
  15. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, p. 141.
  16. ^ a b de Passalacqua 1990, p. 142.
  17. ^ a b Viñas Farré 2009, p. 288.
  18. ^ Trías Monge 1997, pp. 9–10.
  19. ^ Trías Monge 1997, p. 11.
  20. ^ a b c Criollo Oquero 2016.
  21. ^ Hein 2009, pp. 445.
  22. ^ Venator-Santiago 2017, p. 515.
  23. ^ Villazor 2017, p. 1676.
  24. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, p. 144.
  25. ^ a b de Passalacqua 1990, p. 145.
  26. ^ Hein 2009, p. 447.
  27. ^ Villazor 2017, p. 1691.
  28. ^ Revised Statutes 1902, p. xvii.
  29. ^ Figueroa-Torres 2008, p. 2.
  30. ^ a b Volpp 2005, p. 420.
  31. ^ Bredbenner 1998, p. 9.
  32. ^ Bredbenner 1998, p. 241.
  33. ^ Weare 2017, p. 149.
  34. ^ Hein 2009, p. 449.
  35. ^ a b Venator-Santiago 2013, p. 23.
  36. ^ a b c de Passalacqua 1990, p. 149.
  37. ^ Villazor 2017, pp. 1698, 1709.
  38. ^ Venator-Santiago 2013, pp. 14, 23.
  39. ^ a b Congressional Record 1942, p. 601.
  40. ^ Venator-Santiago 2013, pp. 22–23.
  41. ^ Venator-Santiago 2013, pp. 24–25.
  42. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, pp. 149–150.
  43. ^ Revised Statutes 1902, p. 303.
  44. ^ a b de Passalacqua 1990, p. 146.
  45. ^ a b c d Hein 2009, p. 448.
  46. ^ Venator-Santiago 2013, pp. 18–19.
  47. ^ Venator-Santiago 2017, p. 517.
  48. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, p. 147.
  49. ^ Cardona-Arroyo 2019, pp. 72–73.
  50. ^ Hein 2009, p. 450.
  51. ^ Hein 2009, pp. 450–451.
  52. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, p. 150.
  53. ^ Venator-Santiago 2013, p. 13.
  54. ^ Hein 2009, p. 454.
  55. ^ "Puerto Rico pays taxes. The US is obligated to help it just as much as Texas and Florida". Vox. October 4, 2017.
  56. ^ "Why Doesn't Puerto Rico Pay Federal Income Tax?". November 28, 2022.
  57. ^ Aleinikoff 1994, p. 21.
  58. ^ Charles R. Santiago Venator (January 1, 2001). "Race, Space and the Puerto Rican Citizenship". The Denver Law Review at digital commons. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
  59. ^ de Passalacqua 1990, pp. 153–154.
  60. ^ Colón Ocasio 2009, p. 37.
  61. ^ Kelly 1992, pp. 442–444.
  62. ^ Worster 2012, p. 2.
  63. ^ a b de Passalacqua 1997, p. 270.
  64. ^ Huot Calderon 1996, p. 337.
  65. ^ de Passalacqua 1997, p. 271.
  66. ^ Huot Calderon 1996, pp. 332–333.
  67. ^ Martin 1999, p. 22.
  68. ^ Font-Guzman & Aleman 2010, p. 133.
  69. ^ Nylund 2014, p. 223.
  70. ^ a b Aleinikoff 1994, p. 30.
  71. ^ SOLICITUD DE CERTIFICADO DE CIUDADANÍA DE PUERTO RICO
  72. ^ Clark 1975, p. 43.
  73. ^ Terborg-Penn 1998, p. 49.
  74. ^ Clark 1975, p. 42.
  75. ^ Rivera López 2016, pp. 537.
  76. ^ Rivera López 2016, pp. 525–526.
  77. ^ Rivera Lassén 2010, p. 43.
  78. ^ Clark 1975, pp. 43–45.
  79. ^ Roy-Féquière 2004, p. 75.
  80. ^ Aleinikoff 1994, p. 31.
  81. ^ a b Venator-Santiago 2001, p. 907.
  82. ^ Malavet 2010, pp. 242–243.
  83. ^ Malavet 2010, p. 243.
  84. ^ Acosta Pumarejo 2016, p. 112.
  85. ^ Acosta Pumarejo 2016, p. 114.
  86. ^ Kelly 1992, p. 445.
  87. ^ Diario Granma 2006.
  88. ^ Acosta Pumarejo 2016, p. 118.
  89. ^ Acosta Pumarejo 2016, p. 124.

Bibliography

  • Acosta Pumarejo, Enrique (2016). "Eficacia Jurídica: acerca del Certificado de Ciudadanía Puertorriqueña" [Legal Efficacy: About the Puerto Rican Citizenship Certificate]. In Barbosa da Silva Júnior, Dinaldo (ed.). Propuestas de derecho para cuestiones jurídicas universaleswas [Law Proposals for Universal Legal Issues] (in Spanish) (1ª Edição ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Editora Autografia. pp. 111–130. ISBN 978-85-5526-630-0. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  • Aleinikoff, T. Alexander (Winter 1994). "Puerto Rico and the Constitution: Conundrums and Prospects" (PDF). Constitutional Commentary. 11 (1). Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Law School: 15–43. ISSN 0742-7115. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 18, 2021. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  • Bickel, Alexander M. (1973). "Citizenship in the American Constitution" (PDF). Arizona Law Review. 15 (2). Tucson, Arizona: James E. Rogers College of Law: 369–387. ISSN 0004-153X. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 7, 2021. Retrieved March 7, 2021.
  • Bredbenner, Candice Lewis (1998). A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20650-2.
  • Cardona-Arroyo, Aileen (2019). "Balzac v. Porto [sic] Rico". In Lavariega Monforti, Jessica L. (ed.). Latinos in the American Political System: An Encyclopedia of Latinos as Voters, Candidates, and Office Holders [2 volumes]. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 72–73. ISBN 978-1-4408-5347-0.
  • Carlson, Laura (2007). Searching for Equality: Sex Discrimination, Parental Leave, and the Swedish Model with Comparisons to EU, UK, and US Law. Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus Förlag. ISBN 978-91-7678-646-8. Prior to the passage of the federal acts in the 1960s, the legislative variations permissible historically with respect to women's rights under the American federal system initially led to extremely different rights for women depending upon their state of residence
  • Clark, Truman R. (1975). Puerto Rico and the United States, 1917–1933. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press. ISBN 978-0-8229-7605-9.
  • Colón Ocasio, Roberto (2009). Antonio Fernós Isern, soberanista, Luis Muñoz Marín, autonomista: divergencias ideológicas y su efecto en el desarrollo del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico [Antonio Fernós Isern, Sovereignist, Luis Muñoz Marín, Autonomist: Ideological Divergences and Their Effect on the Development of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico] (in Spanish). San Juan, Puerto Rico: Fundación Educativa Antonio Fernós Isern. ISBN 978-1-934461-66-2.
  • Criollo Oquero, Agustín (November 22, 2016). "Breve historia del Código Civil de Puerto Rico" [Brief History of the Civil Code of Puerto Rico]. Caribbean Business (in Spanish). San Juan, Puerto Rico. Archived from the original on March 14, 2021.
  • de Passalacqua, John L. A. (Fall 1990). "The Involuntary Loss of United States Citizenship of Puerto Ricans upon Accession to Independence by Puerto Rico" (PDF). Denver Journal of International Law & Policy. 19 (1). Denver, Colorado: University of Denver College of Law: 139–161. ISSN 0196-2035. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 14, 2021.
  • de Passalacqua, John L. A. (1997). "Voluntary Renunciation of United States Citizenship by Puerto Rican Nationals". Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. 66 (2). Río Piedras, Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico School of Law: 269–304. ISSN 0886-2516 – via HeinOnline.
  • Figueroa-Torres, Marta (May 2008). "Recodification of Civil Law in Puerto Rico: A Quixotic Pursuit of the Civil Code for the New Millennium" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. 12 (1). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Faculty of Law: 1–19. ISSN 1387-3091. OCLC 785897714. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2021.
  • Font-Guzman, Jacqueline N.; Aleman, Yanira (Spring 2010). "Human Rights Violations in Puerto Rico: Agency from the Margins". Journal of Law & Social Challenge (12). San Francisco, California: University of San Francisco School of Law: 107–149. ISSN 1520-0159. Retrieved March 17, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
  • Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (January 1979). "Sexual Equality Under the Fourteenth and Equal Rights Amendments". Washington University Law Review (1). St. Louis, Missouri: Washington University School of Law: 161–178. ISSN 2166-7993. OCLC 8092712430. Archived from the original on December 6, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
  • Hein, John R. (January 2009). "Born in the U.S.A., But Not Natural Born: How Congressional Territorial Policy Bars Native-Born Puerto Ricans from the Presidency". University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. 11 (2). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Law School: 423–457. ISSN 1521-2823. OCLC 8092055580. Archived from the original on September 4, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  • Huot Calderon, Eugenio J. (May–August 1996). "The Concept of Puerto Rican Citizenship". Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueno. 35 (2). Ponce, Puerto Rico: Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico School of Law: 321–346. ISSN 0034-7930. Retrieved March 17, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
  • Kelly, H. Ansgar (January 1992). "Dual Nationality, the Myth of Election, and a Kinder, Gentler State Department". University of Miami Inter-American Law Review. 23 (2). Coral Gables, Florida: University of Miami School of Law: 421–464. ISSN 0884-1756. OCLC 8092081763. Archived from the original on September 21, 2020. Retrieved March 13, 2021.
  • Kerber, Linda K. (December 1997). "The Meanings of Citizenship". The Journal of American History. 84 (3). Bloomington, Indiana: Oxford University Press for the Organization of American Historians: 833–854. doi:10.2307/2953082. ISSN 0021-8723. JSTOR 2953082. OCLC 6911243298. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  • Lapidus, Leonard (1980). State and Federal Regulation of Commercial Banks. Washington, D. C.: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
  • Malavet, Pedro A. (Fall 2010). "The Inconvenience of a 'Constitution [that] Follows the Flag ... But Doesn't Quite Catch Up with It': From Downes v. Bidwell to Boumediene v. Bush". Mississippi Law Journal. 80 (1). Oxford, Mississippi: University of Mississippi School of Law: 181–258. ISSN 0026-6280. OCLC 7375035853. Retrieved March 18, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
  • Martin, David A. (Fall 1999). "New Rules on Dual Nationality for a Democratizing Globe: Between Rejection and Embrace". Georgetown Immigration Law Journal. 14 (1). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Law Center: 1–34. ISSN 0891-4370. OCLC 772688926. Retrieved March 17, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
  • Nylund, Katharine (January 2014). "The Indignity of a False Citizenship: Self-Induced Statelessness in Puerto Rico". Tilburg Law Review. 19 (1–2). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers: 223–235. doi:10.1163/22112596-01902022. ISSN 2211-0046. OCLC 5529140651.
  • Rivera Lassén, Ana Irma (May 2010). "Del dicho al derecho hay un gran trecho o el derecho a tener derechos: decisiones del tribunal supremo de Puerto Rico ante los derechos de las mujeres y de las comunidades LGBTTI" [There Is a Huge Gap from Saying There Are Rights or the Right to Have Rights: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico Regarding the Rights of Women and LGBTTI Communities] (PDF). Revista Jurídica UIPR (in Spanish). 44 (1). San Germán, Puerto Rico: Interamerican University of Puerto Rico: 39–70. ISSN 0041-851X. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 15, 2019. Retrieved November 18, 2019.
  • Rivera López, Lizbeth L. (2016). Las aportaciones sociales y periodísticas de las mujeres en Puerto Rico: desde la llegada de la imprenta en los primeros años del siglo XIX hasta el primer tercio del siglo XX [The Social and Journalistic Contributions of Women in Puerto Rico: From the Arrival of the Printing Press in the First Years of the 19th Century until the First Third of the 20th Century] (PDF) (PhD). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 15, 2019. Retrieved November 17, 2019.
  • Roy-Féquière, Magali (2004). Women, Creole Identity, and Intellectual Life in Early Twentieth-century Puerto Rico. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Temple University Press. ISBN 978-1-59213-231-7.
  • Terborg-Penn, Rosalyn (1998). "Enfranchising Women of Color: Woman Suffragists as Agents of Imperialism". In Pierson, Ruth Roach; Chaudhuri, Nupur; McAuley, Beth (eds.). Nation, Empire, Colony: Historicizing Gender and Race. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. pp. 41–56. ISBN 0-253-11386-5.
  • Trías Monge, José (1997). Puerto Rico: The Trials of the Oldest Colony in the World. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-07618-5.
  • Vázquez, Carlos Manuel (December 2008). "Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties". Harvard Law Review. 122 (2). Harvard Law School: 599–695. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 40042748. OCLC 297394864. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  • Venator-Santiago, Charles R. (2013). "Are Puerto Ricans Native-Born U.S. Citizens? The 1948 Pagán/Fernós-Isern Amendment" (PDF). Ámbito de encuentros. 6 (2). Carolina, Puerto Rico: Universidad del Este: 9–30. ISSN 1933-5342. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 17, 2021. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  • Venator-Santiago, Charles R. (2001). "Race, Space, and the Puerto Rican Citizenship". Denver University Law Review. 78 (4). Denver, Colorado: University of Denver Sturm College of Law: 907–920. ISSN 0011-8834. OCLC 199594995. Retrieved March 18, 2021 – via HeinOnline.
  • Venator-Santiago, Charles R. (March 2017). "US Territorial Citizenship Today: Four Interpretations". PS – Political Science & Politics. 50 (2). New York, New York: Cambridge University Press: 515–519. doi:10.1017/S1049096516003103. ISSN 1049-0965. OCLC 8271230316. S2CID 151942364. Retrieved March 12, 2021. – via Cambridge Core (subscription required)
  • Villazor, Rose Cuison (March 2017). "American Nationals and Interstitial Citizenship". Fordham Law Review. 85 (4). New York, New York: Fordham University School of Law: 1673–1724. ISSN 0015-704X. OCLC 8090930759. Archived from the original on March 22, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  • Viñas Farré, Ramón (2009). "Evolución del derecho de nacionalidad en España: continuidad y cambios más importantes [Evolution of the Right of Nationality in Spain: Continuity and Most Important Changes]". In López, F. J. (ed.). Cursos de derecho internacional y relaciones internacionales de Vitoria-Gasteiz [International Law and International Relations Courses in Vitoria-Gasteiz] (in Spanish). Bilbao, Biscay: Servicio Editorial Universidad del País Vasco. pp. 275–313. ISBN 978-84-9860-432-0.
  • Volpp, Leti (2005). "Divesting Citizenship: On Asian American History and the Loss of Citizenship through Marriage" (PDF). UCLA Law Review. 53 (2). Los Angeles, California: UCLA School of Law: 405–483. ISSN 0041-5650. OCLC 193654281.
  • Weare, Neil (Spring 2017). "Citizenship in U.S. Territories: Constitutional Right or Congressional Privilege?". Centro Journal. 29 (1). New York, New York: Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueños: 136–163. ISSN 1538-6279. OCLC 7107053144. SSRN 2927402. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  • Worster, William Thomas (2012). "Renouncing U.S. Citizenship Through Expatriation". In Davis, Michael H.; Rizzo, Danielle M.; Vrapi, Olsi (eds.). The Consular Practice Handbook. Washington, D.C.: American Immigration Lawyers Association. ISBN 978-1-57370-308-6. SSRN 2429682.
  • Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 77th Congress, Second Session. Vol. 88, Part II: January 5, 1942 to December 16, 1942. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1942.
  • "Juan Mari Bras, primero en recibir la ciudadanía puertorriqueña" [Juan Mari Bras, First to Receive Puerto Rican Citizenship]. Diario Granma (in Spanish). No. 299, Year 10. Havana, Cuba. EFE. October 26, 2006. Archived from the original on March 18, 2021. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  • Revised Statutes and Codes of Porto Rico, Containing All Laws Passed at the First and Second Sessions of the Legislative Assembly, in Effect after July First, Nineteen Hundred And Two, Including the Political Code, the Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Civil Code. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Boletin Mercantil Press. 1902. OCLC 60410913.

External links

  • Media related to Puerto Rican citizenship at Wikimedia Commons
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Rican_citizenship_and_nationality&oldid=1205502145"