Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
 | This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (December 2013) |
| Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 29, 2004 Decided June 14, 2004 | |
| Full case name | Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al. |
| Docket no. | 03-101 |
| Citations | 542 U.S. 55 (more) 124 S. Ct. 2373; 159 L. Ed. 2d 137 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Scalia, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Administrative Procedure Act 702, 704, 706. | |
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004), was a Supreme Court case that held that although the Administrative Procedure Act says that a person may challenge an agency's failure to act, this provision essentially just carries forward the writ of mandamus. Thus an agency cannot be compelled to act unless there is some non-discretionary, discrete act. Therefore, in this case, an interest group could not challenge an agency's failure to "act so as to preserve the wilderness" in accordance with the statute.
Background
Under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, the federal Bureau of Land Management is required to manage "2.5 million acres of land in Utah" called "wilderness study areas." The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and other environmentalist groups filed suit under the Administrative Procedure Act, compelling the government to act when "an agency has failed to meet its legal duties." The Wilderness Alliance claimed that the Bureau of Land Management had failed to adequately protect the study areas and that the bureau permitted off-road vehicle use that damaged the study areas, violating the act passed by Congress in 1976.[1]
See also
References
- ^ "Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance 542 US 55 (2004)". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved December 8, 2013.
External links
- Text of Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55 (2004) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |