File talk:States with same-sex marriage bans.svg

Please comment on the larger stripes. Note that all states that need striping or may need so in the near future are relatively large states. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: if this map is to be used (which I don't necessarily think it should) it needs to match the main map as best as possible. --Prcc27 (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you have no objections as to the legibility or the aesthetics? 0nlyth3truth (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I do, but if this map is going to be used, it needs to be as similar to the main map as possible. --Prcc27 (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are your objections to the legibility or the aesthetics? 0nlyth3truth (talk) 19:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to suggest this map replace the other constitutional map..? --Prcc27 (talk) 21:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is map of the content of state constitutions. This map contains different information. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't the recognition color tell you whether it was struck down by a state court or a federal court..? --Prcc27 (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your question isn't clear. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 00:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Ban on recognition of foreign same-sex marriages struck down, stayed pending appeal"; there isn't any reference to which court it was struck down in like the other stay colors. There's gotta be consistency... --Prcc27 (talk) 05:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Inserted "in federal district court" to the legend. I will not create a color for this situation in either state courts or circuit courts as that is pointless, given that there are no states that applies to. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado has to be triple striped now... [1] --Prcc27 (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added "The map only depicts the highest court to have overturned a ban." to the description. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the proceedings at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg since the ruling will certainly be stayed, and therefore the 4th circuit should be updated and striped. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is a mess. I think the file should not be updated in any way until the stay happens, which will almost certainly be very soon. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I take that back. I'll remove the phrasing "stayed pending appeal," and reinsert it as soon as the stay happens. This can apply to Colorado also. 0nlyth3truth (talk) 20:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]