File talk:Karajordjevo agreement 1991.png

This map has no sources. It should be deleted promtly.--Čeha (razgovor) 23:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. It states: "Map based on image of the agreement shown in the BBC documentary Death of Yugoslavia.". Alan.Ford.Jn (talk) 08:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that is false. I watched the documentary and in it there was no map. Can you give me the printscreen of that map? There is no source. Fourther more, the map is clearly a forgery. Person which made this puted half of 99% croat western Herzegovina with Neum into a Serbian state, and municipalities like Srbac with 99% of Serbian majority into Croat State. It looks like something kid would draw. Where are serious sources? If there is none, map should be deleted promtly. --Čeha (razgovor) 15:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First, you should contact the author of the image with your explanation. Meanwhile, I am going to download and watch the movie mentioned. Then, I will respond. Alan.Ford.Jn (talk) 22:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And? Have you found the non existent source? You had 2 week time :) I contacted R-41 post. If you have any knowledge of the region you can not seriously look at that map and claim it as correct. I'll remove the links on it and I expect of you that affter this discussion you help me delete it. It is realy something that 2 year child would draw. --Čeha (razgovor) 08:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I made a serious mistake with the title: this is not the Karadjordjevo Agreement, it is an agreement between the Bosnian Croats, the Croatian government, and the Bosnian Serbs who agreed to partition Croatia, with one of the border areas being the Neretva river. I will re-upload the image under a new title. I based the image off of one in a video, it is not my fault if the image on the video was of poor quality. The video clip is on Youtube, watch from 8:16 to 8:47 for the context, the map itself at 8:45, here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G40RiG2EQ-s&feature=related. Also, Čeha, stop with the aggressive tone with the accusation of "forgery", saying that it is something that "a kid would draw" and "Have you found the non existant source", it is a guideline to be respectful to other users. I've been through nasty arguments with other users before with accusations, etc, and I now have zero-tolerance for it, I report it as personal attacks when it gets started, that's my habit, so please attempt to be polite.--R-41 (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, upon re-watching the video and looking at info on meetings between Karadzic and the Croat leadership, I believe the map in the film as represented in this image represents the Graz agreement.--R-41 (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The years have past, and this poor/fake map is still here? Shouldn't it be already deleted as original investigation work? No sources, no knowledge of language, just few spots of color...--Čeha (razgovor) 12:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was so damn professional, isn't it?? As you do not understand the language you did not understand that it presents areas of control and conflict in 1991 and 1992.
Graz agreement had not connection to the government of Croatia but with Croat leaders from BiH.

try next time to upload the images that you understand! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.142.140.74 (talk) 12:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, you have no reason to be so hot-headed and abusive over some little thing. And quit with the personal attacks. They are banned on Wikipedia. Though I suppose you are an anonymous user, because you don't understand Wikipedia policy or have been banned and can only use anonymous accounts for your abusive behaviour.--R-41 (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing on your obvious errors is not personal attack! You are monoglot and making map based on some foreign-language quote from 30 sec video. Fatal choice that causes fatal errors.--78.2.132.231 (talk) 09:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reference to this map? Who claims this? This is completely arbitrary map, with many areas impossible to be agreed like this. Moreplovac (talk) 14:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]