1956 United States presidential election in South Carolina
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 8 South Carolina votes to the Electoral College | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in South Carolina |
|---|
 |
The 1956 United States presidential election in South Carolina took place on November 6, 1956, as part of the 1956 United States presidential election. South Carolina voters chose eight[3] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
For six decades up to 1950 South Carolina had been a one-party state dominated by the Democratic Party. The Republican Party had been moribund due to the disfranchisement of blacks and the complete absence of other support bases as South Carolina completely lacked upland or German refugee whites opposed to secession.[4] Between 1900 and 1948, no Republican presidential candidate ever obtained more than seven percent of the total presidential vote[5] – a vote which in 1924 reached as low as 6.6 percent of the total voting-age population[6] (or approximately 15 percent of the voting-age white population).
This absolute loyalty began to break down during World War II when Vice-Presidents Henry A. Wallace and Harry Truman began to realize that a legacy of discrimination against blacks was a threat to the United States' image abroad and its ability to win the Cold War against the radically egalitarian rhetoric of Communism.[7] In the 1948 presidential election, Truman was backed by only 24 percent of South Carolina's limited electorate – most of that from the relatively few upcountry poor whites able to meet rigorous voting requirements – and state Governor Strom Thurmond won 71 percent, carrying every county except Anderson and Spartanburg. Despite Truman announcing as early as May 1950 that he would not run again for President in 1952,[8] it had already become clear that South Carolina's rulers remained severely disenchanted with the national Democratic Party.[9] Both Thurmond and former Governor James F. Byrnes would endorse national Republican nominee Dwight D. Eisenhower[10] – who ran under an independent label in South Carolina – and Democratic nominee Adlai Stevenson II only won narrowly due to two- and three-to-one majorities in the poor white counties that had given substantial opposition to Thurmond in 1948.[11]
During the first Eisenhower term, South Carolina’s whites who had supported him became extremely critical because Eisenhower was blamed for Brown v. Board of Education, whose requirement of desegregating the state’s schools was intolerable. Consequently, state leaders like Thurmond argued that the GOP could not be a useful tool for opposing civil rights, and most of the state’s Democrats endorsed Stevenson for his rematch with Eisenhower.[12] Byrnes, however, obtained 35,000 petitions for an alternative slate of unpledged electors, whom he naturally endorsed when ballot access was obtained for that slate.[13]
In mid-October, the consensus among pollsters was that the state’s vote would be sharply split between the three slates,[14] although polls just before election day suggested that Stevenson was likely to carry the state.[15]
Results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Adlai Stevenson | 136,372 | 45.37% | |
| “Nominated by Petition” | Unpledged electors | 88,509 | 29.45% | |
| Republican | Dwight D. Eisenhower (inc.) | 75,700 | 25.18% | |
| Write-in | 2 | 0.00% | ||
| Total votes | 300,583 | 100% | ||
Results by county
| County | Adlai Stevenson II Democratic |
Dwight David Eisenhower Republican |
Unpledged Electors “Nominated by Petition” |
Margin[b] | Total votes cast | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Abbeville | 2,985 | 83.36% | 339 | 9.47% | 257 | 7.18% | 2,646[c] | 73.89% | 3,581 |
| Aiken | 4,280 | 34.81% | 6,195 | 50.38% | 1,821 | 14.81% | -1,915[c] | -15.57% | 12,296 |
| Allendale | 380 | 28.85% | 262 | 19.89% | 675 | 51.25% | -295 | -22.40% | 1,317 |
| Anderson | 11,344 | 76.80% | 2,186 | 14.80% | 1,241 | 8.40% | 9,158[c] | 62.00% | 14,771 |
| Bamberg | 430 | 22.95% | 326 | 17.40% | 1,118 | 59.66% | -688 | -36.71% | 1,874 |
| Barnwell | 1,914 | 63.61% | 520 | 17.28% | 575 | 19.11% | 1,339 | 44.50% | 3,009 |
| Beaufort | 710 | 25.57% | 1,051 | 37.85% | 1,016 | 36.59% | 35[d] | 1.26% | 2,777 |
| Berkeley | 902 | 24.14% | 1,055 | 28.24% | 1,779 | 47.62% | -724[d] | -19.38% | 3,736 |
| Calhoun | 341 | 28.90% | 146 | 12.37% | 693 | 58.73% | -352 | -29.83% | 1,180 |
| Charleston | 4,028 | 16.07% | 7,487 | 29.86% | 13,558 | 54.07% | -6,071[d] | -24.21% | 25,073 |
| Cherokee | 3,687 | 75.21% | 907 | 18.50% | 308 | 6.28% | 2,780[c] | 56.71% | 4,902 |
| Chester | 2,951 | 62.80% | 1,007 | 21.43% | 741 | 15.77% | 1,944[c] | 41.37% | 4,699 |
| Chesterfield | 3,559 | 71.35% | 795 | 15.94% | 634 | 12.71% | 2,764[c] | 55.41% | 4,988 |
| Clarendon | 661 | 24.74% | 224 | 8.38% | 1,787 | 66.88% | -1,126 | -42.14% | 2,672 |
| Colleton | 1,463 | 36.14% | 635 | 15.69% | 1,950 | 48.17% | -487 | -12.03% | 4,048 |
| Darlington | 2,908 | 40.91% | 1,597 | 22.47% | 2,603 | 36.62% | 305 | 4.29% | 7,108 |
| Dillon | 1,879 | 62.97% | 313 | 10.49% | 792 | 26.54% | 1,087 | 36.43% | 2,984 |
| Dorchester | 862 | 26.80% | 504 | 15.67% | 1,851 | 57.54% | -989 | -30.74% | 3,217 |
| Edgefield | 525 | 25.71% | 516 | 25.27% | 1,001 | 49.02% | -476 | -23.31% | 2,042 |
| Fairfield | 961 | 36.29% | 519 | 19.60% | 1,168 | 44.11% | -207 | -7.82% | 2,648 |
| Florence | 3,463 | 35.46% | 1,855 | 19.00% | 4,447 | 45.54% | -984 | -10.08% | 9,765 |
| Georgetown | 1,020 | 23.39% | 1,057 | 24.24% | 2,284 | 52.37% | -1,227[d] | -28.13% | 4,361 |
| Greenville | 11,819 | 43.46% | 10,752 | 39.54% | 4,622 | 17.00% | 1,067[c] | 3.92% | 27,193 |
| Greenwood | 4,386 | 64.95% | 1,120 | 16.59% | 1,247 | 18.47% | 3,139 | 46.48% | 6,753 |
| Hampton | 564 | 27.43% | 359 | 17.46% | 1,133 | 55.11% | -569 | -27.68% | 2,056 |
| Horry | 4,835 | 59.17% | 1,092 | 13.36% | 2,244 | 27.46% | 2,591 | 31.71% | 8,171 |
| Jasper | 210 | 16.52% | 403 | 31.71% | 658 | 51.77% | -255[d] | -20.06% | 1,271 |
| Kershaw | 1,875 | 34.79% | 1,518 | 28.17% | 1,996 | 37.04% | -121 | -2.25% | 5,389 |
| Lancaster | 4,398 | 66.26% | 1,610 | 24.26% | 629 | 9.48% | 2,788[c] | 42.00% | 6,637 |
| Laurens | 3,726 | 56.05% | 1,377 | 20.71% | 1,545 | 23.24% | 2,181 | 32.81% | 6,648 |
| Lee | 943 | 38.26% | 250 | 10.14% | 1,272 | 51.60% | -329 | -13.34% | 2,465 |
| Lexington | 2,094 | 36.50% | 1,188 | 20.71% | 2,455 | 42.79% | -361 | -6.29% | 5,737 |
| Marion | 1,390 | 43.99% | 417 | 13.20% | 1,353 | 42.82% | 37 | 1.17% | 3,160 |
| Marlboro | 1,769 | 63.22% | 507 | 18.12% | 522 | 18.66% | 1,247 | 44.56% | 2,798 |
| McCormick | 485 | 55.81% | 102 | 11.74% | 282 | 32.45% | 203 | 23.36% | 869 |
| Newberry | 2,671 | 52.07% | 1,061 | 20.68% | 1,398 | 27.25% | 1,273 | 24.82% | 5,130 |
| Oconee | 3,510 | 73.17% | 911 | 18.99% | 376 | 7.84% | 2,599[c] | 54.18% | 4,797 |
| Orangeburg | 2,511 | 36.28% | 1,467 | 21.20% | 2,943 | 42.52% | -432 | -6.24% | 6,921 |
| Pickens | 1,847 | 43.17% | 1,747 | 40.84% | 684 | 15.99% | 100[c] | 2.33% | 4,278 |
| Richland | 6,154 | 27.49% | 6,714 | 29.99% | 9,516 | 42.51% | -2,802[d] | -12.52% | 22,384 |
| Saluda | 1,080 | 47.24% | 341 | 14.92% | 865 | 37.84% | 215 | 9.40% | 2,286 |
| Spartanburg | 16,637 | 65.03% | 6,822 | 26.67% | 2,124 | 8.30% | 9,815[c] | 38.36% | 25,583 |
| Sumter | 937 | 15.53% | 1,356 | 22.47% | 3,741 | 62.00% | -2,385[d] | -39.53% | 6,034 |
| Union | 3,760 | 66.10% | 1,252 | 22.01% | 676 | 11.88% | 2,508[c] | 44.09% | 5,688 |
| Williamsburg | 683 | 18.20% | 330 | 8.80% | 2,739 | 73.00% | -2,056 | -54.80% | 3,752 |
| York | 6,835 | 59.25% | 3,508 | 30.41% | 1,192 | 10.33% | 3,327[c] | 28.84% | 11,535 |
| Totals | 136,372 | 45.37% | 75,700 | 25.18% | 88,511 | 29.45% | 47,861 | 15.92% | 300,583 |
Analysis
Ultimately South Carolina was won by Adlai Stevenson II (D–Illinois), running with Tennessee Senator Estes Kefauver by a more decisive margin than polls predicted.[17] Stevenson gained 45.37 percent of the popular vote thanks to his continued dominance of the upcountry, whilst Eisenhower and the unpledged slate divided the lowcountry vote, with the unpledged slate finishing second with 29.45 percent and Eisenhower – this time running under the “Republican” banner – with 25.18 percent[18] Wealthier whites left Eisenhower for the unpledged slate in large numbers, but unlike in 1952 when the small number of black voters strongly supported Stevenson, Eisenhower gained substantial, even majority, support from blacks able to vote in Charleston and Columbia.[12]
The 1956 election in South Carolina marks the second of only three times in the 20th century that an incumbent president has finished third in any state.[e] As of the 2020 presidential election[update], this is the last time that a Republican has been elected president without carrying South Carolina, and the last time that Greenville County voted for a Democratic presidential candidate. It is also the last time that Lexington County was not carried by the Republican candidate.[19]
Notes
- ^ Although he was born in Texas and grew up in Kansas before his military career, at the time of the 1952 election Eisenhower was president of Columbia University and was, officially, a resident of New York. During his first term as president, he moved his private residence to Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, and officially changed his residency to Pennsylvania.
- ^ Because the unpledged elector slate finished ahead of Eisenhower in South Carolina as a whole, unless noted otherwise margin given is Stevenson vote minus unpledged vote and percentage margin Stevenson percent minus unpledged slate percentage.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m In this county where Eisenhower did run ahead of the unpledged slate, margin given is Stevenson vote minus Eisenhower vote and percentage margin Stevenson percentage minus Eisenhower percentage.
- ^ a b c d e f g In this county where Stevenson ran third behind both Eisenhower and the unpledged slate, margin given is Eisenhower vote minus unpledged vote and percentage margin Eisenhower percentage minus unpledged slate percentage.
- ^ The other cases are William Howard Taft, who finished third overall in 1912, and George H. W. Bush, who finished third in Maine in 1992. Harry S. Truman in 1948 and Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964, however, were not even on the ballot in Alabama due to intractable opposition to those presidents’ civil rights policies by Alabama’s ruling politicians.
References
- ^ "United States Presidential election of 1956 – Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved June 10, 2017.
- ^ "The Presidents". David Leip. Retrieved September 27, 2017.
Eisenhower's home state for the 1956 Election was Pennsylvania
- ^ "1956 Election for the Forty-Fourth Term (1961-65)". Retrieved June 10, 2017.
- ^ Phillips, Kevin P. The Emerging Republican Majority. pp. 208, 210. ISBN 9780691163246.
- ^ Mickey, Robert (2015). Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America's Deep South, 1944-1972. p. 440. ISBN 0691149631.
- ^ Mickey. Paths Out of Dixie, p. 27
- ^ Fredericksen, Karl A. The Dixiecrat Revolt and the End of the Solid South. p. 52. ISBN 0807849103.
- ^ Truman, Harry S. President Harry S. Truman’s Office Files, 1945-1953. p. 30. ISBN 1556551533.
- ^ Bedingfield, Sid (2014). Beating Down the Fear: The Civil Sphere and Political Change in South Carolina, 1940-1962 (Thesis). University of South Carolina Dissertations. p. 139. Docket 2793.
- ^ Mayer, Michael S. The Eisenhower Years. p. 767. ISBN 1438119089.
- ^ Strong, Donald S. (August 1955). "The Presidential Election in the South, 1952". The Journal of Politics. 17 (3). University of Chicago Press: 343–389.
- ^ a b Mickey. Paths Out of Dixie, p. 233
- ^ "South Carolina Democratic Party Split". The Decatur Daily Review. September 12, 1956. p. 6.
- ^ See "Association with Youth Can Furnish New Confidence in future of America". Florence Morning News. October 17, 1956. p. 4.
- ^ "Southern Negroes Seen Casting Heaviest Vote Since Reconstruction Days". Tampa Tribune. November 6, 1956. p. 9.
- ^ Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964; p. 397 ISBN 0405077114
- ^ "The American Presidency Project – Election of 1956". Retrieved June 10, 2017.
- ^ "1956 Presidential General Election Results – South Carolina". Retrieved June 10, 2017.
- ^ Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
