1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg/1280px-William_Jennings_Bryan_2_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg/1280px-William_McKinley_by_Courtney_Art_Studio,_1896_(cropped).jpg)
| Elections in Tennessee |
|---|
 |
 Government |
The 1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee took place on November 3, 1896. All contemporary 45 states were part of the 1896 United States presidential election. Tennessee voters chose 12 electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.
For over a century after the Civil War, Tennessee’s white citizenry was divided according to partisan loyalties established in that war. Unionist regions covering almost all of East Tennessee, Kentucky Pennyroyal-allied Macon County, and the five West Tennessee Highland Rim counties of Carroll, Henderson, McNairy, Hardin and Wayne[1] voted Republican – generally by landslide margins – as they saw the Democratic Party as the “war party” who had forced them into a war they did not wish to fight.[2] Contrariwise, the rest of Middle and West Tennessee who had supported and driven the state’s secession was equally fiercely Democratic as it associated the Republicans with Reconstruction.[3] After the state’s white landowning class re-established its rule in the early 1870s, black and Unionist white combined to forge adequate support for the GOP to produce a competitive political system for two decades,[4] although during this era the Republicans could only capture statewide offices when the Democratic Party was divided on this issue of payment of state debt.[4]
White Democrats in West Tennessee were always aiming to eliminate black political influence, which they first attempted to do by election fraud in the middle 1880s and did so much more successfully at the end of that decade by instituting in counties with significant black populations a secret ballot that prevented illiterates voting,[5] and a poll tax throughout the state, which cut turnout by at least a third in the 1890s.[6] This poll tax was supposedly relaxed or paid by party officials in Unionist Republican areas,[6] where whites were much poorer than in secessionist areas.
The mid-1890s Populist movement did not affect Tennessee so much as other southern states, with the party never cracking 12 percent in any biennial gubernatorial election. Although the state’s poll tax had already reduced the Republican black and poor white electorate, Democratic managers were unsure about carrying Tennessee in late October, because it was felt that urban businessmen would desert the party in sufficient numbers for McKinley to come close to carrying the state.[7] Polls the day before the election suggested Tennessee would be exceedingly close,[8] but as it turned out Bryan would carry the state relatively easily by nearly six points, which was still a decline upon recent Democratic performances despite a quantitatively reduced Republican electorate.
Tennessee would be won by the Democratic and Populist nominees, former Representative of Nebraska William Jennings Bryan and his running mate Arthur Sewall of Maine. They defeated the Republican nominees, former Ohio Governor William McKinley and his running mate Garret Hobart of New Jersey. Bryan won the state by a margin of 5.76%.
Bryan would later win Tennessee against McKinley again four years later and would later win the state again in 1908 against William Howard Taft.
Results
| 1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee[9] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
| Democratic | William Jennings Bryan | 162,643 | 50.68% | 12 | |
| Populist | William Jennings Bryan | 4,525 | 1.41% | 0 | |
| Total | William Jennings Bryan | 67,168 | 52.09% | 12 | |
| Republican | William McKinley | 148,683 | 46.33% | 0 | |
| Prohibition | Joshua Levering | 3,099 | 0.97% | 0 | |
| National Democratic | John M. Palmer | 1,953 | 0.61% | 0 | |
| Totals | 320,903 | 100.00% | 12 | ||
| Voter turnout | — | ||||
Results by county
| 1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee by county[10] | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | William Jennings Bryan Democratic |
William McKinley Republican |
Joshua Levering Prohibition |
John McAuley Palmer National Democratic |
Margin | Total votes cast | |||||
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Anderson | 745 | 24.87% | 2,224 | 74.23% | 5 | 0.17% | 22 | 0.73% | -1,479 | -49.37% | 2,996 |
| Bedford | 2,596 | 53.34% | 2,151 | 44.20% | 50 | 1.03% | 70 | 1.44% | 445 | 9.14% | 4,867 |
| Benton | 1,465 | 65.20% | 769 | 34.22% | 12 | 0.53% | 1 | 0.04% | 696 | 30.97% | 2,247 |
| Bledsoe | 478 | 37.49% | 785 | 61.57% | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 0.94% | -307 | -24.08% | 1,275 |
| Blount | 970 | 26.41% | 2,652 | 72.20% | 48 | 1.31% | 3 | 0.08% | -1,682 | -45.79% | 3,673 |
| Bradley | 1,057 | 37.32% | 1,725 | 60.91% | 45 | 1.59% | 5 | 0.18% | -668 | -23.59% | 2,832 |
| Campbell | 571 | 19.14% | 2,389 | 80.06% | 13 | 0.44% | 11 | 0.37% | -1,818 | -60.92% | 2,984 |
| Cannon | 1,276 | 61.82% | 778 | 37.69% | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 0.48% | 498 | 24.13% | 2,064 |
| Carroll | 2,293 | 46.45% | 2,577 | 52.20% | 61 | 1.24% | 6 | 0.12% | -284 | -5.75% | 4,937 |
| Carter | 445 | 13.87% | 2,700 | 84.14% | 35 | 1.09% | 29 | 0.90% | -2,255 | -70.27% | 3,209 |
| Cheatham | 1,237 | 69.81% | 496 | 27.99% | 9 | 0.51% | 30 | 1.69% | 741 | 41.82% | 1,772 |
| Chester | 1,078 | 63.37% | 607 | 35.68% | 14 | 0.82% | 2 | 0.12% | 471 | 27.69% | 1,701 |
| Claiborne | 1,152 | 33.90% | 2,230 | 65.63% | 8 | 0.24% | 8 | 0.24% | -1,078 | -31.72% | 3,398 |
| Clay | 836 | 59.42% | 548 | 38.95% | 22 | 1.56% | 1 | 0.07% | 288 | 20.47% | 1,407 |
| Cocke | 980 | 27.47% | 2,582 | 72.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 0.14% | -1,602 | -44.91% | 3,567 |
| Coffee | 1,891 | 72.42% | 639 | 24.47% | 52 | 1.99% | 29 | 1.11% | 1,252 | 47.95% | 2,611 |
| Crockett | 1,665 | 58.12% | 1,166 | 40.70% | 34 | 1.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 499 | 17.42% | 2,865 |
| Cumberland | 418 | 34.12% | 800 | 65.31% | 1 | 0.08% | 6 | 0.49% | -382 | -31.18% | 1,225 |
| Davidson | 7,511 | 54.99% | 5,720 | 41.88% | 159 | 1.16% | 269 | 1.97% | 1,791 | 13.11% | 13,659 |
| DeKalb | 1,626 | 49.39% | 1,633 | 49.61% | 28 | 0.85% | 5 | 0.15% | -7 | -0.21% | 3,292 |
| Decatur | 997 | 52.78% | 890 | 47.11% | 2 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 107 | 5.66% | 1,889 |
| Dickson | 1,976 | 68.92% | 841 | 29.33% | 36 | 1.26% | 14 | 0.49% | 1,135 | 39.59% | 2,867 |
| Dyer | 2,589 | 73.63% | 868 | 24.69% | 44 | 1.25% | 15 | 0.43% | 1,721 | 48.95% | 3,516 |
| Fayette | 2,373 | 63.79% | 1,316 | 35.38% | 9 | 0.24% | 22 | 0.59% | 1,057 | 28.41% | 3,720 |
| Fentress | 301 | 27.17% | 798 | 72.02% | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 0.81% | -497 | -44.86% | 1,108 |
| Franklin | 2,584 | 73.79% | 834 | 23.81% | 50 | 1.43% | 34 | 0.97% | 1,750 | 49.97% | 3,502 |
| Gibson | 4,203 | 65.87% | 1,955 | 30.64% | 216 | 3.39% | 7 | 0.11% | 2,248 | 35.23% | 6,381 |
| Giles | 3,992 | 62.32% | 2,372 | 37.03% | 21 | 0.33% | 21 | 0.33% | 1,620 | 25.29% | 6,406 |
| Grainger | 1,002 | 34.91% | 1,863 | 64.91% | 5 | 0.17% | 0 | 0.00% | -861 | -30.00% | 2,870 |
| Greene | 2,726 | 42.83% | 3,577 | 56.21% | 53 | 0.83% | 8 | 0.13% | -851 | -13.37% | 6,364 |
| Grundy | 997 | 75.99% | 286 | 21.80% | 17 | 1.30% | 12 | 0.91% | 711 | 54.19% | 1,312 |
| Hamblen | 1,033 | 40.18% | 1,506 | 58.58% | 27 | 1.05% | 5 | 0.19% | -473 | -18.40% | 2,571 |
| Hamilton | 3,729 | 44.32% | 4,468 | 53.10% | 121 | 1.44% | 96 | 1.14% | -739 | -8.78% | 8,414 |
| Hancock | 456 | 23.35% | 1,490 | 76.29% | 7 | 0.36% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,034 | -52.94% | 1,953 |
| Hardeman | 2,234 | 60.25% | 1,427 | 38.48% | 1 | 0.03% | 46 | 1.24% | 807 | 21.76% | 3,708 |
| Hardin | 1,332 | 37.99% | 2,165 | 61.75% | 7 | 0.20% | 2 | 0.06% | -833 | -23.76% | 3,506 |
| Hawkins | 1,723 | 37.65% | 2,824 | 61.71% | 13 | 0.28% | 16 | 0.35% | -1,101 | -24.06% | 4,576 |
| Haywood | 2,392 | 78.79% | 624 | 20.55% | 2 | 0.07% | 18 | 0.59% | 1,768 | 58.23% | 3,036 |
| Henderson | 1,316 | 39.11% | 2,009 | 59.70% | 40 | 1.19% | 0 | 0.00% | -693 | -20.59% | 3,365 |
| Henry | 3,077 | 67.17% | 1,473 | 32.15% | 14 | 0.31% | 17 | 0.37% | 1,604 | 35.01% | 4,581 |
| Hickman | 1,553 | 60.52% | 988 | 38.50% | 13 | 0.51% | 12 | 0.47% | 565 | 22.02% | 2,566 |
| Houston | 896 | 70.16% | 343 | 26.86% | 23 | 1.80% | 15 | 1.17% | 553 | 43.30% | 1,277 |
| Humphreys | 1,604 | 76.93% | 465 | 22.30% | 10 | 0.48% | 6 | 0.29% | 1,139 | 54.63% | 2,085 |
| Jackson | 1,752 | 69.88% | 754 | 30.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.04% | 998 | 39.81% | 2,507 |
| James | 327 | 33.37% | 647 | 66.02% | 4 | 0.41% | 2 | 0.20% | -320 | -32.65% | 980 |
| Jefferson | 902 | 25.32% | 2,638 | 74.06% | 9 | 0.25% | 13 | 0.36% | -1,736 | -48.74% | 3,562 |
| Johnson | 224 | 11.72% | 1,683 | 88.02% | 5 | 0.26% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,459 | -76.31% | 1,912 |
| Knox | 4,020 | 38.52% | 6,243 | 59.83% | 117 | 1.12% | 55 | 0.53% | -2,223 | -21.30% | 10,435 |
| Lake | 811 | 85.01% | 126 | 13.21% | 11 | 1.15% | 6 | 0.63% | 685 | 71.80% | 954 |
| Lauderdale | 2,244 | 74.97% | 709 | 23.69% | 7 | 0.23% | 33 | 1.10% | 1,535 | 51.29% | 2,993 |
| Lawrence | 1,376 | 53.21% | 1,203 | 46.52% | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 0.27% | 173 | 6.69% | 2,586 |
| Lewis | 329 | 61.73% | 204 | 38.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 125 | 23.45% | 533 |
| Lincoln | 3,269 | 73.94% | 992 | 22.44% | 120 | 2.71% | 40 | 0.90% | 2,277 | 51.50% | 4,421 |
| Loudon | 594 | 28.91% | 1,447 | 70.41% | 11 | 0.54% | 3 | 0.15% | -853 | -41.51% | 2,055 |
| Macon | 869 | 39.63% | 1,324 | 60.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -455 | -20.75% | 2,193 |
| Madison | 3,701 | 77.80% | 1,024 | 21.53% | 17 | 0.36% | 15 | 0.32% | 2,677 | 56.27% | 4,757 |
| Marion | 1,320 | 41.85% | 1,801 | 57.10% | 5 | 0.16% | 28 | 0.89% | -481 | -15.25% | 3,154 |
| Marshall | 2,835 | 75.50% | 849 | 22.61% | 57 | 1.52% | 14 | 0.37% | 1,986 | 52.89% | 3,755 |
| Maury | 4,021 | 60.47% | 2,537 | 38.15% | 59 | 0.89% | 33 | 0.50% | 1,484 | 22.32% | 6,650 |
| McMinn | 1,388 | 37.83% | 2,235 | 60.92% | 34 | 0.93% | 12 | 0.33% | -847 | -23.09% | 3,669 |
| McNairy | 1,516 | 50.89% | 1,463 | 49.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 53 | 1.78% | 2,979 |
| Meigs | 721 | 52.70% | 641 | 46.86% | 2 | 0.15% | 4 | 0.29% | 80 | 5.85% | 1,368 |
| Monroe | 1,578 | 48.29% | 1,634 | 50.00% | 47 | 1.44% | 9 | 0.28% | -56 | -1.71% | 3,268 |
| Montgomery | 2,804 | 46.04% | 2,934 | 48.17% | 252 | 4.14% | 101 | 1.66% | -130 | -2.13% | 6,091 |
| Moore | 942 | 89.71% | 78 | 7.43% | 28 | 2.67% | 2 | 0.19% | 864 | 82.29% | 1,050 |
| Morgan | 452 | 27.80% | 1,140 | 70.11% | 19 | 1.17% | 15 | 0.92% | -688 | -42.31% | 1,626 |
| Obion | 3,775 | 74.59% | 1,147 | 22.66% | 98 | 1.94% | 41 | 0.81% | 2,628 | 51.93% | 5,061 |
| Overton | 1,495 | 66.24% | 761 | 33.72% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.04% | 734 | 32.52% | 2,257 |
| Perry | 1,000 | 63.57% | 572 | 36.36% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.06% | 428 | 27.21% | 1,573 |
| Pickett | 394 | 42.00% | 544 | 58.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -150 | -15.99% | 938 |
| Polk | 749 | 44.01% | 947 | 55.64% | 3 | 0.18% | 3 | 0.18% | -198 | -11.63% | 1,702 |
| Putnam | 1,750 | 61.08% | 1,097 | 38.29% | 14 | 0.49% | 4 | 0.14% | 653 | 22.79% | 2,865 |
| Rhea | 1,124 | 44.75% | 1,324 | 52.71% | 46 | 1.83% | 18 | 0.72% | -200 | -7.96% | 2,512 |
| Roane | 821 | 20.51% | 3,026 | 75.59% | 142 | 3.55% | 14 | 0.35% | -2,205 | -55.08% | 4,003 |
| Robertson | 2,943 | 65.02% | 1,386 | 30.62% | 182 | 4.02% | 15 | 0.33% | 1,557 | 34.40% | 4,526 |
| Rutherford | 3,352 | 59.46% | 2,203 | 39.08% | 23 | 0.41% | 59 | 1.05% | 1,149 | 20.38% | 5,637 |
| Scott | 209 | 10.96% | 1,691 | 88.67% | 7 | 0.37% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,482 | -77.71% | 1,907 |
| Sequatchie | 386 | 61.27% | 241 | 38.25% | 3 | 0.48% | 0 | 0.00% | 145 | 23.02% | 630 |
| Sevier | 428 | 11.20% | 3,376 | 88.35% | 13 | 0.34% | 4 | 0.10% | -2,948 | -77.15% | 3,821 |
| Shelby | 5,830 | 52.01% | 5,122 | 45.70% | 42 | 0.37% | 215 | 1.92% | 708 | 6.32% | 11,209 |
| Smith | 2,414 | 68.89% | 1,064 | 30.37% | 20 | 0.57% | 6 | 0.17% | 1,350 | 38.53% | 3,504 |
| Stewart | 1,642 | 71.42% | 648 | 28.19% | 9 | 0.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 994 | 43.24% | 2,299 |
| Sullivan | 2,512 | 56.05% | 1,914 | 42.70% | 53 | 1.18% | 3 | 0.07% | 598 | 13.34% | 4,482 |
| Sumner | 3,171 | 71.34% | 1,215 | 27.33% | 11 | 0.25% | 48 | 1.08% | 1,956 | 44.00% | 4,445 |
| Tipton | 2,119 | 51.07% | 1,894 | 45.65% | 13 | 0.31% | 123 | 2.96% | 225 | 5.42% | 4,149 |
| Trousdale | 769 | 70.81% | 313 | 28.82% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.37% | 456 | 41.99% | 1,086 |
| Unicoi | 89 | 9.86% | 804 | 89.04% | 7 | 0.78% | 3 | 0.33% | -715 | -79.18% | 903 |
| Union | 599 | 24.30% | 1,862 | 75.54% | 2 | 0.08% | 2 | 0.08% | -1,263 | -51.24% | 2,465 |
| Van Buren | 419 | 73.12% | 140 | 24.43% | 5 | 0.87% | 9 | 1.57% | 279 | 48.69% | 573 |
| Warren | 2,101 | 69.96% | 842 | 28.04% | 39 | 1.30% | 21 | 0.70% | 1,259 | 41.92% | 3,003 |
| Washington | 1,661 | 36.67% | 2,807 | 61.98% | 43 | 0.95% | 18 | 0.40% | -1,146 | -25.30% | 4,529 |
| Wayne | 748 | 33.04% | 1,505 | 66.48% | 10 | 0.44% | 1 | 0.04% | -757 | -33.44% | 2,264 |
| Weakley | 3,934 | 65.14% | 2,003 | 33.17% | 99 | 1.64% | 3 | 0.05% | 1,931 | 31.98% | 6,039 |
| White | 1,839 | 74.12% | 617 | 24.87% | 16 | 0.64% | 9 | 0.36% | 1,222 | 49.25% | 2,481 |
| Williamson | 3,097 | 69.66% | 1,281 | 28.81% | 51 | 1.15% | 17 | 0.38% | 1,816 | 40.85% | 4,446 |
| Wilson | 3,436 | 68.17% | 1,568 | 31.11% | 17 | 0.34% | 19 | 0.38% | 1,868 | 37.06% | 5,040 |
| Totals | 168,176 | 52.23% | 148,773 | 46.20% | 3,099 | 0.96% | 1,953 | 0.61% | 19,403 | 6.03% | 322,001 |
See also
Notes
References
- ^ Wright, John K.; ‘Voting Habits in the United States: A Note on Two Maps’; Geographical Review, vol. 22, no. 4 (October 1932), pp. 666-672
- ^ Key (Jr.), Valdimer Orlando; Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York, 1949), pp. 282-283
- ^ Lyons, William; Scheb (II), John M. and Stair Billy; Government and Politics in Tennessee, pp. 183-184 ISBN 1572331410
- ^ a b Kousser, J. Morgan; The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910, p. 104 ISBN 0-300-01973-4
- ^ Kousser; The Shaping of Southern Politics, p. 110
- ^ a b Kousser, The Shaping of Southern Politics, p. 118
- ^ ‘Doubtful about Tennessee: Democratic Managers Uncertain about Carrying the State’; Evening Star, October 28, 1896, p. 1
- ^ ‘Pluralities for President: Major McKinley’s Secretary Compiles a Table’; The Wilkes-Barre Record, November 2, 1896, p. 2
- ^ Dave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas; Presidential General Election Results – Tennessee
- ^ "Popular Vote at the Presidential Election for 1896". Géoelections. (.xlsx file for €30 including full minor party figures)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}